What data for this category looks like
Data for this category comes from regulatory and rule databases, higher-level law databases, departmental policy document libraries, and administrative regulatory document filing systems. Data update frequency is irregular. Documents processed daily include regulatory document drafts, drafting explanatory notes, legality review opinions, summaries of solicited comments, and filing reports. Each document contains fields such as document text, drafting unit information, relevant solicited opinion material identifiers, and filing numbers. There is no fixed, uniform single-document length; it varies with the scale of the document content.
What constraints these characteristics impose on HTTP interfaces and external systems
Decentralized data sources and irregular updates require HTTP interfaces to support integration with multiple external systems, adapt to authentication and format specifications of different data sources, and allow on-demand triggering of data synchronization. Diverse document types and non-uniform field structures require the interface's responseData to support dynamic field parsing, without hardcoding fixed return structures. The size of single documents varies with content, so interface request and response body size limits must allow sufficient flexibility. Timeout settings must match the actual time required for document review. Additionally, review errors can lead to consequences such as filing corrections, so the interface must return clear status codes and error messages to facilitate quick problem location.
How to configure settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication Method | Configure the Authorization parameter using Bearer Token format | Adapts to standard authentication requirements of multiple external systems, ensuring secure data calls |
| Request Variables | Pass the variables parameter to carry the unique identifier of the file to be reviewed | Accurately matches file query conditions for the corresponding data source, avoiding confusion between different review tasks |
| Response Data Parsing | Enable the responseData dynamic parsing mode | Adapts to diverse external system return formats, without hardcoding fixed field structures |
| Timeout Setting | 600 seconds | Matches the actual time required for regulatory document review, avoiding timeouts triggered by differences in file scale |
| Retry Interval | 30 seconds | Adapts to rate limiting rules of external systems, avoiding interception due to frequent calls |
| Single Request Data Volume | Calibrate based on actual testing | Adapts to regulatory document files of different sizes, avoiding request body overlimit errors |
Three common configuration errors
- A 401 status code is returned after calling the interface, with an authentication failure prompt displayed. The cause is that the
Authorizationparameter is not configured correctly, or the Token has insufficient permissions to access the external data source. - The review result field returned by the interface is empty, meaning the
responseDatadoes not contain legality review opinion content. The cause is that dynamic parsing mode is not enabled, and hardcoded fields cannot match the actual field structure returned by the external system. - A timeout error is triggered after calling the interface, meaning the request is terminated after exceeding the preset time. The cause is that the timeout setting value is too small, and does not match the actual time required for regulatory document review.
How to confirm the configuration is correct
- Call the test interface with a known valid file identifier, and check that the returned status code is 200.
- View the fields returned in
responseData, and confirm that expected content such as legality review opinions and filing numbers is included. - Pass test documents of different sizes, and verify that no overlimit errors occur for the interface request and response bodies.
- Simulate a scenario with incorrect authentication parameters, and confirm that the interface returns a clear authentication failure prompt.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.