What This Category of Data Looks Like
Data for this category is generated across the full lifecycle of financial expenditure performance evaluation. Sources include the integrated budget management system, project declaration materials, fund payment data, business system ledgers, and satisfaction surveys. Commonly processed documents include performance target forms, self-assessment forms, performance evaluation reports, supporting material lists, and rectification reports. Fields include project unique identifiers, fund amounts, performance indicators, supporting material association relationships, and more. Data updates occur annually. The size of individual documents varies based on project hierarchy. The core associated fields are project numbers and fund disbursement records.
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Deployment and Upgrade
Annually updated data has periodic peak loads. Sufficient storage and computing resources must be reserved during deployment to support batch document processing. Mixed structured and unstructured data from multiple sources requires deploying modules compatible with multi-format parsing during setup. The project unique identifier, as the core associated field, must have clear indexing rules configured in the knowledge base to prevent data association failures. Supporting materials involved in file review are mostly scanned documents or structured tables. The upgrade process must ensure the document parsing module supports common government document formats. Additionally, performance evaluation involves sensitive financial data. Deployment must configure access control policies that meet government data security requirements.
How to Configure the System
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
DB_MAX_LINK | 20–30 connections | Adapts to annual batch performance evaluation document database connection requirements, prevents task queuing caused by exhausted connection pools |
MONGODB_URI | Configure the address of a government cloud-exclusive MongoDB instance | Stores structured metadata for performance evaluation files, ensures data isolation and access security |
REDIS_URL | Configure the address of a local high-availability Redis cluster | Caches frequently accessed performance indicators and project association data, reduces database query pressure |
STORAGE_S3_ENDPOINT | Configure the government cloud object storage service endpoint | Stores unstructured documents such as supporting materials and self-assessment reports, complies with government data storage compliance requirements |
ROOT_KEY | Generate a key based on government data permission levels | Controls the highest access permission for the knowledge base, prevents unauthorized access to sensitive financial data |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Slow system response and timeout during single batch processing of performance files. Cause: The
DB_MAX_LINKconfiguration was not adjusted for annual data peaks, insufficient database connection pool leads to request queuing. - curl calls to the interface return connection refused errors. Cause:
PG_URLorREDIS_URLwere not configured correctly, basic services failed to start properly. - The page fails to load normally on older browsers. Cause: The deployment process did not adapt to the target browser version for front-end compilation, and compatibility configuration was not completed for older kernel browsers commonly used in government work.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Run a test task for batch importing performance target forms, observe the peak database connection count, confirm the connection count does not exceed the
DB_MAX_LINKconfigured range. - Call the object storage interface to upload supporting materials, confirm files can be stored and downloaded normally, matching the
STORAGE_S3_ENDPOINTconfiguration rules. - Access the front-end address using an older browser, confirm page elements render normally, verify compatibility of the front-end compilation configuration.
- Attempt to access the knowledge base interface using an unauthorized key, confirm the request is blocked, verify that the
ROOT_KEYpermission control is effective.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.