What This Category of Data Looks Like
Data in this category typically originates from the integrated budget management system, department staff establishment system, prior year final accounts, project repository, and Ministry of Finance budget preparation notices. The update frequency is annual. Daily documents include department budget drafts, project application forms, performance target forms, staff expense calculation forms, and budget approvals. Most documents use structured tables paired with explanatory text. Fields cover project name, declared amount, staff establishment base, performance target details, and more. Units include ten thousand yuan, person, and specific quantitative indicator units.
Constraints Imposed on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems
Scattered data sources require integration with multiple fiscal external systems. Configure independent access authentication parameters for each system. The annual concentrated update cycle concentrates interface calls during the budget preparation period, so support batch data requests in a short time. Standardized structured document fields require HTTP interfaces to return data fields that strictly match those in declaration materials and files. Otherwise, the data cannot directly support review and verification. Data errors directly lead to budget returns or failed reviews, so ensure accuracy and completeness of interface returned data.
Configuration Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Exclusive API token for each connected fiscal system | Completes identity verification when connecting to external systems such as the integrated budget management system, ensuring interface access security |
variables | Preset fixed parameters such as declaration batch and unit code according to the annual budget cycle | Adapts to the annual update frequency of department budget preparation, reducing repeated input operations |
responseData | Extract fields that one-to-one match those in department budget drafts and project application forms | Ensures interface returned data can be directly used for document matching and verification in file review |
| Request timeout setting | 600 seconds | Adapts to the time consumption requirements of multi-system data aggregation, avoiding request interruptions due to large data volumes |
| Batch request threshold | First 50 data entries per request | Balances interface load and data processing efficiency, matching the batch review scenario of annual budget preparation |
| Number of error retries | 3 times | Addresses temporary network fluctuations, ensuring the success rate of data requests |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: Database connection workflow reports an error, SQL statement fails to retrieve data. Cause: Category-specific parameters such as unit code and project repository ID required for department budget preparation are not written to
variables, leading to failed SQL query condition matching. - Symptom: HTTP node accesses a Peanut Shell address and returns the
getaddrinfo ENOTFOUNDerror. Cause: The platform’s allowed domain name whitelist is not configured, and the Peanut Shell address is not included in the accessible range. - Symptom: The
variablesparameter of the custom tool disappears from the interface. Cause: Old workflow variable configurations are not retained after upgrading the FastGPT version, or fixed parameters for department budget preparation are not correctly bound in the new version interface.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Initiate a single test request, check whether the fields returned in
responseDatafully match those in the department budget application form. - Call the system interface corresponding to
Authorization, use the platform debugging tool to verify that the return status code is 200, confirming normal access permissions. - Preset the annual parameters in
variables, initiate a batch request, and verify that the request is not interrupted due to missing parameters. - Simulate temporary network fluctuations, verify whether the error retry configuration is triggered, ensuring that the request can automatically recover after a failure.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.