Declaration Material and Case File Audit for State-owned Capital Operation Companies: HTTP Interfaces and External Systems

Declaration Material and Case File Audit for State-owned Capital Operation Companies: HTTP Interfaces and External Systems

What Data for This Category Looks Like

Data mainly comes from state-owned assets supervision and reporting systems, internal project management archives, and electronic materials submitted by declaration entities. Update rhythm follows the progress of individual declaration project workflows, and becomes archived static data after audit is completed. The document structure includes structured metadata and attachment packages. Metadata fields include project unique identifier, unified social credit code of the declaration entity, audit node status, and total material size. Attachments include PDF scans, Excel forms, and similar file types. Field units uniformly follow standardized formats published by state-owned assets systems.

What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems

Structured metadata must strictly match standardized fields from state-owned assets systems. Interface request parameters must include complete and compliant metadata items, otherwise they will be intercepted by the supervision system. The size of a single declaration material attachment can reach hundreds of megabytes. Interfaces must be configured for large file transfer adaptation to prevent transmission interruptions. Data in the declaration process is updated as needed. Interfaces must support pulling incremental data by project number. Archived case file data is read-only. Interfaces must be configured with Authorization permission verification, and only allow calls from service accounts belonging to audit personnel. In FastGPT v4.17.0, corresponding permission verification rules must be enabled in the external interface configuration module to ensure interface call security.

How to Configure

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
Interface timeout period600 secondsAdapt to the transmission and audit parsing duration of single large attachments
AuthorizationFixed service account secretMatch the permission verification rules of state-owned assets systems to prevent unauthorized access
variablesBind project number variablesImplement pulling corresponding case file data by individual declaration project
Large file upload threshold1000 MBCover the common attachment upper limit of declaration materials for state-owned capital operation companies
responseDataReturn only structured audit fieldsReduce invalid data transmission and improve interface call efficiency
Request retry count3 timesRespond to temporary network fluctuations and avoid single call failures

Three Common Misconfigurations

  • Interface calls return cross-origin interception errors, with status codes indicating CORS-related exceptions. Cause: No allowed call domain name whitelist configured for the interface, and cross-origin request adaptation not enabled.
  • Interface calls return 401 Unauthorized, or FastGPT testing prompts insufficient permissions. Cause: The service account secret configured for the Authorization parameter failed permission verification by the state-owned assets system.
  • Uploading large declaration case files prompts transmission failure, with file upload progress interrupted. Cause: Large file upload threshold not adjusted, or interface timeout settings adapted to large files not configured.

How to Verify Proper Configuration

  • Call the configured interface, pass a test project number, and check if the returned responseData contains the expected structured metadata fields.
  • Use the FastGPT v4.17.0 interface testing tool, initiate a request with the correct Authorization parameter, and confirm the returned status code is 200.
  • Upload a test material with a volume matching the business upper limit, and check if the interface can receive the material normally and return a processing result.
  • Configure the project variable bound by variables, initiate multiple calls, and confirm that each call only pulls case file data for the corresponding project.

The configuration values listed above are common starting points. They should be evaluated against specific samples and operational requirements of the relevant scenario.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.