What this category of data looks like
Urban water utilities application materials and case review data primarily originate from business operation systems of water utility operators, administrative approval platforms, and archived case repositories. The data includes main qualification documents, project drawings, payment vouchers for water supply installation applications and drainage permit declarations, as well as case records for law enforcement inspections and operation and maintenance rectification. The platform updates data in real time when applications are submitted, and archives and locks the data after the case closes. Documents combine structured forms and unstructured attachments. Fields include application number, project address, water usage scale, approval stage, and other relevant items. Units involved include cubic meters, square meters, working days, and similar units.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the source citation and traceability link
Application materials and cases for urban water utilities have characteristics of both structured forms and unstructured attachments. Unstructured attachments are mostly project drawings and PDF approval records. The citation and traceability process must match both form fields and source identifiers of attachment content. The platform updates data in real time when applications are submitted, and archives and locks the data after the case closes. This requires the cited version to match the archived version of the current business stage. Fields include quantified information with units, such as water usage scale and pipe network length. Traceability must retain the correspondence between original units and numerical values. Cases are linked to multi-stage approval materials. Full traceability of the entire chain of source records from submission to case closure is required, to avoid missing supporting documents from intermediate stages.
How to Set Configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
quoteMaxToken | 8000–12000 token | Water utility cases and application materials include long texts such as drawing descriptions and approval records, requiring sufficient tokens to accommodate complete source content |
responseData | Return complete source paths and field identifiers | Clear traceability to specific document numbers and attachment storage locations in water utility systems is required, to avoid vague traceability |
detail | Enable full-field traceability | Both structured fields and attachments of water utility application materials require associated traceability, covering all information supporting review |
| Version matching settings | Bind archived timestamp of business stage | Water utility data updates in real time with business operations, requiring the cited version to match the archived version of the current business stage |
| Unit retention configuration | Force inclusion of original unit fields | Water utility data includes quantified information such as water usage scale and pipe network length. Units must be retained during traceability to ensure accurate review basis |
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
Three Common Misconfigurations
- The page viewing model context only displays 30 entries, but the actual number of cited entries is 310, and the number sent to the caller is also 310. The cause is incorrect configuration of the truncation logic for
quoteMaxToken, leading to a mismatch between the front-end displayed context cache and the number of source data entries in actual calls. - The generated reply cannot display the attachment storage path of the citation source. The cause is failure to enable the complete path return configuration for
responseData, only returning field names without associating actual storage locations. - The original unit information of water utility application material fields is lost in citations. The cause is failure to configure the traceability rule for unit retention, only extracting numerical content without associating original unit fields.
How to Confirm Configurations Are Correct
- Submit a water utility application test material including multiple attachments and structured fields, and check whether the generated reply includes complete source paths and field identifiers.
- Adjust the value of
quoteMaxToken, and verify whether the number of context entries displayed on the front end matches the number of source data entries in actual calls. - Check whether quantified content in the generated reply includes original units, confirming that the unit retention configuration is active.
- Submit the same case material for different business stages, and verify that the cited version matches the archived version of the current business stage.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.