Mining and Mineral Processing Declaration Materials and File Review: Tool Calling and Plugins

What This Category of Data Looks Like

Data for mining and mineral processing declaration materials and file review comes primarily from internal geological exploration archives of mining enterprises, mining permit approval files, mineral processing production ledgers, and safety supervision filing materials. Data updates are completed alongside individual mining project milestones or quarterly regulatory requirements. Document structures include two categories: structured declaration forms, and unstructured scanned documents and PDF reports. Core fields include unique mining area ID, monthly total mining volume, mineral processing throughput, and safety inspection record number. Corresponding units are tons, cubic meters, and workdays. There is no unified field naming rule.

What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Tool Calling and Plugins

This data category mixes structured forms and unstructured archives. It requires tool calling to support both structured field extraction and unstructured text parsing. Plugins must adapt to format conversion for multi-source heterogeneous data. There is no unified field naming rule. Custom field mapping must be implemented via plugin configuration to avoid data loss caused by field mismatches. Data updates dynamically with project progress. Configure the plugin’s data source synchronization cycle to ensure the latest filing materials are used during review. Individual file materials have large volume. Limit the document chunk size processed by the plugin in a single run to prevent memory overflow.

How to Configure Settings

Three Common Configuration Mistakes

• Tool calling results do not appear in the current dialog box, and are only visible after re-entering the session. This occurs because the real-time result return configuration for functionCall is not enabled, so intermediate tool returns are not included in the current context.
• The parsing plugin remains in a connection wait state when called, and no response body is obtained. This occurs because the timeout threshold setting does not match the parsing time of large file materials, or chunk processing rules are not configured.
• Internal auxiliary invocation logs from the plugin are retained in historical conversations, which interferes with the current review context. This occurs because context filtering rules are not configured, and non-business invocation records from the plugin itself are not excluded.

How to Verify Correct Configuration

• Upload a standard mining exploitation declaration form to trigger tool calling, and check if structured field extraction results display in real time in the dialog box.
• Upload a single file material with a volume of approximately 10 MB, confirm that tool calling does not trigger a timeout interruption, and check if parsing time in background logs matches expected values.
• Send two consecutive review requests, and check if only business-related invocation records are retained in historical conversations, with no internal auxiliary plugin logs.
• View the plugin configuration page, and confirm that the toolChoice and functionCall parameter settings match the preset configuration.

The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.