What the data for this category looks like
Data sources include work safety supervision systems, enterprise hidden danger self-inspection systems, law enforcement inspection records, and accident statistics systems. Data is updated daily. Daily documents include hidden danger investigation checklists, hidden danger governance ledgers, rectification notices, review records, and major hidden danger listing and supervision orders.
Data fields cover hidden danger type, investigation location, rectification responsible person, rectification deadline, review result, and other items. There are no unified fixed units, and field formats must match those of corresponding documents.
Typical covered entities include emergency management departments, industry competent departments, safety management departments of production and business units, park management committees, and other related parties. Core business processes include standard-based investigation, rectification tracking, review and cancellation, and other links.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the forms and interactions link
Daily updated data sources require forms to synchronize the latest hidden danger list entries on a regular basis. Expired investigation or rectification options must not be used.
Differences in fields across multiple document types require forms to support custom field groups. This adapts to entry needs for different scenarios such as rectification notices and review records.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration business scenarios require forms to support role-based tiered permission configuration. Editable fields are distinguished for different roles including investigation, rectification, and review, to prevent unauthorized operations.
The core closed-loop hidden danger management process requires forms to link subsequent links. Interaction logic for automatically associating rectification submissions and review reminders reduces omissions from manual follow-up.
The investigation link that follows major accident hidden danger judgment standards requires forms to include built-in field verification. This prevents entry of non-compliant hidden danger types.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Suggested Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Configure as text, dropdown, or date types based on hidden danger document fields. Support custom fields and auto-fill of the first 5 historical investigation records | Adapt to field differences across multiple document types such as hidden danger investigation checklists and rectification notices, reduce duplicate entry workload |
userSelect | Divide permissions by role: investigation personnel can only fill in investigation items, rectification personnel can edit rectification fields | Cover multi-stakeholder collaboration business scenarios, prevent unauthorized operations |
| Synchronization trigger timing | Synchronize the latest hidden danger list from data sources daily at midnight. Synchronization duration must not exceed 600 seconds | Match the daily update frequency of data, ensure form options comply with latest judgment standards in real time |
| Input verification rules | Configure format verification for required fields, match the filing requirements of corresponding documents | Ensure entered data complies with specifications of hidden danger governance ledgers and rectification notices |
| Submission timeout threshold | Set single form submission timeout threshold to 30 seconds | Adapt to interaction response rhythm of daily business handling, avoid long waiting times |
Three common mistakes
- Phenomenon: Code running tool configuration wires are not displayed in the tool call panel. Cause: Advanced configuration switch for tool calls is not enabled, or the current FastGPT v4.17.0 version does not load the corresponding tool module.
- Phenomenon: Hidden danger data is not synchronized to the supervision system after form submission. Cause: Synchronization trigger timing of data sources is not configured, or synchronization threshold is set too long, causing synchronization failure.
- Phenomenon: Entered hidden danger type does not comply with supervision requirements. Cause: Latest hidden danger list data source is not synchronized regularly, causing form dropdown options to not include latest judgment standards.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Enter the form editing page, check whether field types match those of documents such as hidden danger investigation checklists and rectification notices.
- Switch accounts of different roles, verify whether permission configurations take effect, confirm that different roles can only edit fields within their corresponding permissions.
- Manually trigger a data source synchronization, check whether the synchronization process completes normally, and form dropdown options have been updated to the latest content.
- Submit a test form data, confirm whether the preset subsequent link linkage logic is triggered, such as automatic association of rectification reminders.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own specific samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.