What data for this category looks like
Core data for this category comes from enterprise contract management systems, compliance risk databases, law and regulation repositories, case management systems, and reporting platforms. Processed daily documents include compliance risk lists, contract legal review opinions, legal opinions on major matters, compliance review forms, and violation investigation reports. Data is updated monthly. Most documents have fixed structures, containing fields such as risk level, review conclusion, and violation items. There are no unified fixed units. The length of individual documents varies widely, ranging from a few pages of compliance review forms to dozens of pages of case investigation reports.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on document parsing and chunking?
Documents from multiple sources have different formats. PDFs may contain compliance forms with fixed layouts. DOCX files often have structured review process fields. The parsing process must adapt to multiple layout formats. Monthly updated batch documents require handling multiple files per batch. This demands stability in upload and parsing operations. Core information in compliance documents is concentrated in sections such as review opinions and risk judgments. When chunking, context association must be retained to avoid splitting core logic. Additionally, the data involves sensitive operational compliance content. Parsed chunks must accurately retain original fields without omitting key information. Omitting key information may reduce the accuracy of subsequent business process guidance.
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chunkSize | 800–1200 characters | Compliance documents often contain long paragraphs of review opinions and risk analysis. Overly long chunks lose context association. Overly short chunks break the complete logic of individual clauses. This setting adapts to the structural characteristics of common documents in this category. |
chunkSplitter | Split by paragraph + heading | Compliance documents usually have clear chapter headings and clause paragraphs. Splitting by paragraph retains the complete logic of individual review opinions or risk items. It avoids splitting core conclusions across paragraphs. |
customPdfParse | Enabled | Compliance PDFs often contain encrypted forms or fixed-layout review opinions. Enabling custom parsing accurately extracts text fields. It prevents information loss caused by format confusion. |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 1000 MB | Compliance documents may include batch contracts or case files. Setting a reasonable upper limit prevents upload failures. It meets the processing needs of monthly batch updates. |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | Large compliance case files take a long time to parse. Extending the timeout period prevents mid-process interruptions. It meets the stability requirements for batch document processing. |
Three common misconfigurations
- Text fields are empty after uploading compliance PDFs. This occurs because
customPdfParseis not enabled. The fixed layout format of compliance documents is not supported, so core review opinions are not extracted. - Compliance documents pushed from external systems are not parsed correctly. This occurs because the corresponding file storage directory is not configured. The system cannot read the pushed files to complete parsing and chunking.
- Attempting to upload audio or video violation reporting materials related to compliance results in failed parsing. This occurs because the current document parsing only supports PDF and DOCX formats. Parsing logic for audio and video files is not supported.
How to confirm configurations are properly set
- Upload a standard compliance review form PDF. Check whether the parsed text completely extracts core fields such as review opinions and risk levels.
- Upload a contract file around 100 MB in size. Confirm that the parsing process does not trigger a timeout error, and that the chunking results are complete.
- Review the chunking results. Confirm that individual chunks do not split core contract review clauses and their corresponding conclusions.
- After enabling
customPdfParse, check whether text extraction from encrypted compliance forms works normally, with no format confusion issues.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.