What this category of data consists of
The core data for this category comes from the ecological environment law enforcement system, automatic pollution source monitoring platform, and reports submitted by third-party testing institutions. Daily processed documents include on-site inspection records, sampling records, monitoring reports, order for correction decisions, and administrative penalty decisions. These documents contain fields such as inspection locations, sampling time, pollutant concentrations, law enforcement document numbers, and more. Data is updated daily, covering full-process information for online monitoring and on-site law enforcement of pollutant discharge units within the jurisdiction. Fields must match the format requirements of legal documents for law enforcement and monitoring to ensure data compliance and traceability.
Constraints on HTTP interfaces and external systems
Multiple data sources require interfaces to support different data formats from various systems. Unified authentication rules must be configured to ensure compliant API calls. The daily data update rhythm requires interface call frequency to match the update cycle of business systems, to avoid exceeding interface limits due to frequent calls. Diverse daily document structures require interfaces to support flexible field extraction and mapping, to adapt to information needs across different law enforcement scenarios. Core law enforcement and monitoring data has high accuracy requirements, so interfaces must include failure retry and data verification mechanisms. This prevents loss of law enforcement evidence due to temporary system fluctuations, which could affect the legality of law enforcement processes.
Configuration settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Bearer {Exclusive API key assigned by the ecological environment system} | Ensure compliant data call permissions when connecting to multiple ecological environment business systems |
variables | Map core fields from on-site inspection records, sampling records, and monitoring reports to workflow variables | Adapt to the diverse structure of daily documents, unify input parameters for process guidance |
responseData | Extract core fields such as online monitoring concentrations, sampling locations, and law enforcement document numbers | Focus on core law enforcement and monitoring data, simplify information retrieval for process guidance |
| Failure retry configuration | 3 retries, 60-second interval | Address temporary fluctuations in online monitoring platforms and law enforcement systems, improve data synchronization success rate |
| Timeout configuration | 300 seconds | Adapt to time-consuming steps such as data comparison and document generation, prevent process interruptions |
| Interface rate limit | Calibrated based on actual testing | Match the daily data update rhythm, avoid exceeding call limits of third-party systems |
Three common configuration errors
- Errors related to configuration failures returned when calling external system interfaces, or uncaught exceptions triggered by workflows. Cause: Incorrect authentication or variable mapping parameters, failure to match permission and field requirements of ecological environment business systems.
- Key information from sampling records or monitoring reports not displayed in the process guidance interface. Cause: Incorrect field extraction rules, failure to extract core business fields for process display.
- Process interruptions caused by interface call timeouts. Cause: Too short timeout configuration, failure to adapt to time-consuming steps such as data comparison and law enforcement document generation.
How to verify successful configuration
- The test interface is called, and the returned response data is checked for the presence of core fields such as online monitoring concentrations and sampling locations.
- A simulated law enforcement process is initiated, and workflow variables are verified to correctly map relevant information from on-site inspection records.
- An interface call failure scenario is simulated, and the system is confirmed to trigger the preset retry mechanism.
- The authentication configuration is checked, and the used API key is confirmed to have access permissions for the corresponding business system.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against applicable operational samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.