What this category of data looks like
This category of data comes from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the national enterprise credit information publicity system, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Commonly involved documents include on-site inspection records, interrogation records, evidence lists, administrative penalty prior notice letters, hearing notice letters, penalty decisions, and service receipts. Each document corresponds to fixed law enforcement links and field requirements, and must be used in association according to the case handling process, with no extra non-case-related data mixed in.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the "workflow orchestration" link
Multi-source data access requires the workflow to be configured with multiple nodes to connect to different data sources separately, to avoid mixing different types of data. Daily updated data sources require a scheduled synchronization node to ensure the timeliness of case file data. Differences in fields and rules for different law enforcement documents require the workflow to bind exclusive variables according to document types, to prevent missing fields or rule conflicts. The fixed link order of the case handling process requires workflow nodes to be triggered in accordance with law enforcement logic in sequence, and the order cannot be adjusted arbitrarily.
How to set configurations
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Variable Management | Create variables by law enforcement document type | It is necessary to distinguish the required fields and verification rules for different documents such as on-site inspection records and penalty decisions |
| Node Trigger Rules | Bind law enforcement links by nodeId | Must match the fixed case handling process: evidence collection → record making → discretion application → legal review → archiving |
| Context Length | 8000–12000 token | Calibrated through actual testing, adapted to the full text content and associated data of multiple law enforcement documents |
| Timeout Setting | 600 seconds | Must reserve reasonable time for law enforcement recorder footage analysis and cross-database queries |
| Single Search Limit | Top 5 entries | Matches the retrieval needs for core evidence and legal clauses in law enforcement scenarios |
| Question Optimization Component | Place after the user input node | It is necessary to standardize the problem expression in law enforcement scenarios first, then match the corresponding case handling process |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Workflow dialogue display fails, but response logs exist in the model backend. The cause is that
variablesfor required fields of law enforcement documents are not configured, resulting in missing parameters during node execution. - Prompt words do not take effect in the expected order. The cause is that workflow nodes are not sorted according to law enforcement procedures, and the output of the preceding node is not correctly passed to the link bound by the subsequent
nodeId. - The question optimization component is placed incorrectly. The cause is that the component is placed after the legal clause matching node, which cannot standardize problem expressions in law enforcement scenarios in advance, leading to subsequent matching deviations.
How to Confirm Successful Configuration
- Check whether
variablescover all required fields of law enforcement documents, with no missing items. - Verify that the law enforcement links bound by
nodeIdare completely consistent with the actual case handling process, with no reversed order or missing links. - Simulate input in a law enforcement scenario, and confirm that the node trigger sequence conforms to case handling logic, with no abnormal interruptions.
- Test the timeout setting, and confirm that the preset failure handling process is triggered when the 600-second threshold is exceeded.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.