What the data for this category looks like
Data for coal chemical industry business handling process guidance comes from internal standardized business manuals, local government service item lists, and on-site handling ledgers. Data updates are triggered synchronously with industry policy adjustments and internal enterprise process optimizations, with no fixed cycle. Each document has five fixed modules: application conditions, submitted materials, handling nodes, time limits for completion, and responsible entities. Fields include node serial number, link name, material list, handling unit, and legal time limit. Units uniformly use industry-standard units such as working days, copies, and square meters.
Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on Tool Calling and Plugins
The fixed module structure of coal chemical industry business process data requires precise matching of preset fields such as application conditions and handling nodes during tool calling. This avoids information misalignment caused by generalized retrieval. Legal time limits are measured in working days. Plugin calls must automatically convert between working days and calendar days to avoid misleading handling staff. The order of process nodes varies between enterprises. Tools must support custom node mapping rules to adapt to different entities. Data updates have no fixed cycle due to policy adjustments. Plugins must be configured with a regular pull mechanism, and must not rely on static caching.
Configuration Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
toolChoice | auto | Automatically match the appropriate tool for coal chemical industry process queries |
functionCall | enabled | Force enable tool calling mode to handle process-related questions |
| Tool call timeout | 300 seconds | Match the standard response cycle for coal chemical industry process reviews |
| Number of recalled results | Top 3 | Avoid excessive redundant information interfering with process node judgment |
| Custom node mapping | Calibrated based on actual testing | Adapt to process node differences across different coal chemical enterprises |
| Answer traceability configuration | enabled | Meet business traceability requirements |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Symptom: The conversation log appears empty after invoking a workflow, and process execution records cannot be viewed. Cause: The workflow's log storage plugin is not configured, or the plugin's storage permissions are not granted to the corresponding business account.
- Symptom: The model used for tool calling when creating a new AI chat does not match the preset. Cause: The default model for tool calling is not locked in global settings, or the chat configuration overrides the global settings.
- Symptom: No answer source is displayed when calling corpus only via API. Cause: Traceability binding is not enabled in the tool call configuration, or the corpus's source field is not associated with returned content.
How to Confirm Proper Configuration
- Initiate a test request related to business handling, and check whether the returned results include preset process node fields.
- Check the tool call log panel to confirm that configuration items such as timeout time and number of recalled results match the preset values.
- Trigger a process data update, and check whether the plugin can pull the latest policy adjustment content.
- Verify the traceability function, and confirm that the returned results include the module name and source information of the corresponding document.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.