What the data for this category looks like
This category's data comes from the national public resource trading platform, local public resource trading platforms, project approval systems, and bidding and tendering supervision systems, with a daily update frequency. Daily processed documents include bidding announcements, qualification pre-qualification documents, bidding documents, tendering documents, bid evaluation reports, successful bid candidate announcements, and similar materials. The document structure centers on core fields such as engineering project section division, qualification requirements, bill of quantities, bid evaluation rules, covering specific content like qualification requirements, performance certificates, construction period, and similar details. The length of individual documents varies widely, from several hundred-word announcements to tens of thousands-word bidding documents.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the multi-turn dialogue and prompt words link
The data sources for this category are scattered and have varying formats. The structure of bidding and tendering documents released by different platforms differs, requiring prompt words for multi-turn dialogue to adapt to the field rules of different documents. Daily updated data sources require that dialogue context be limited to a valid duration to avoid calling outdated bidding and tendering information. The wide span of individual document lengths requires that the context length and retention duration of multi-turn dialogue match the information needs of different scenarios, while also distinguishing between bidding and tendering business data and party building learning-related rule requirements to avoid confusion between the two types of information. In addition, fields such as qualifications and performance in the bidding and tendering link require precise matching, and prompt words must clearly guide dialogue to focus on verification and interpretation of specified fields.
How to set the configurations
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Context Length | 8000–12000 characters | This category has a wide span of document lengths. Multi-turn dialogue needs to retain recent bidding and tendering content and party building questions. This range can cover the information needs of most scenarios |
chatId binding rule | Bind a unique chatId by project section | Bidding and tendering projects take sections as independent units. Dialogues for different sections need to isolate contexts to avoid information cross-talk |
variables configuration | Preset two types of variables: general bidding and tendering rules, and party building supervision requirements | Standardized rule content needs to be called uniformly to ensure consistency of Q&A |
messages context organization rule | Retain the last 3 rounds of dialogue by conversation turn | Avoid excessive historical information interfering with current questions, adapting to the precise Q&A needs of the bidding and tendering scenario |
| Single Knowledge Base Recall Limit | Top 3 entries | Bidding and tendering document fields are precise. Excessive recall will increase prompt word redundancy and affect answer accuracy |
| Dialogue Context Retention Duration | 24 hours | This category of data is updated daily. Retaining context within 24 hours ensures information timeliness |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: Historical information from the old section is still retained after switching sections during a dialogue. Cause: The
chatIdis not bound by section, or the context refresh trigger condition is not configured. - Phenomenon: Unrequested bidding and tendering document fragments are automatically included in the answer. Cause: The automatic knowledge base reference switch is not turned off, or the prompt word does not clearly limit the reference scope.
- Phenomenon: When uploading new bidding and tendering attachments, the system parses previously uploaded documents at the same time. Cause: The attachments are not bound to the current dialogue, and the knowledge base recall is not restricted to only the currently uploaded content.
How to Confirm the Configuration is Correct
- Launch a multi-turn dialogue involving two different sections, and verify that after switching sections, the system no longer references historical information from the previous section.
- Upload a single bidding and tendering document and launch a question, and verify that the system only calls the content of the currently uploaded document.
- Generate a dialogue sharing link, and verify that after configuring the authentication rules, unauthorized users cannot access the link.
- Launch a question involving party building supervision requirements, and verify that the answer strictly matches the preset
variablesrule content.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.