What data for this category looks like
This category’s data typically comes from urban management law enforcement platforms, urban operation grid platforms, video surveillance systems, and public complaint work orders. It updates daily. Daily documents include inspection records, case filing approval forms, on-site photos, rectification notices, penalty decisions, and case closure reports. Core fields include case number, law enforcement officer identification, on-site location information, violation type judgment, rectification execution status, and more. Some documents link to multimedia evidence materials. The data structure grows more comprehensive as the case progresses through its workflow.
Constraints on forms and interactions from these characteristics
Dispersed data sources and multimedia materials require forms to support mixed text, image, and location input. The daily update feature requires the interaction link to support real-time data synchronization. This ensures law enforcement officers access party building learning reference content that matches the latest case status. The integrity of core fields directly affects case compliance. Forms must enforce mandatory verification of key information entry to avoid insufficient evidence or law enforcement disputes from missing fields. The need to assist with violation type judgment requires the interaction link to connect to a prebuilt party building-led law enforcement specification library. This library provides real-time references for form input.
Configuration settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Config Item | Recommended Setting | Basis for This Setting |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Support mixed input of text, images, and location; enable mandatory field verification | This category's daily documents include multiple types of evidence materials, and it is necessary to ensure the completeness of core case information |
userSelect | Preset law enforcement scenario and violation type options, limit single or double selection | Assist in quickly matching the party building-led law enforcement specification library, improving interaction efficiency |
| Single search upper limit | Top 3 entries | Avoid excessive search results interfering with on-site rapid disposal, meeting the real-time requirements of urban management scenarios |
| Maximum context | 800–1200 characters | Adapt to the length range of daily documents in this category, control interaction response time |
| Response timeout | 5 seconds | Adapt to on-site rapid disposal needs, avoid long waiting affecting law enforcement processes |
| Verification rules | Mandatory verification of case number and on-site location fields | Prevent law enforcement disputes or administrative reconsideration caused by missing key information |
Three common configuration errors
- Phenomenon: When configuring the knowledge base reference upper limit, only fixed gears of 100 or 900 can be selected, and custom values around 300 cannot be set. Reason: Some configuration panels do not provide a manual input range entry, only displaying predefined gear options.
- Phenomenon: When using the workflow judgment module, the "equal to" and "starts with" rules trigger the ELSE branch, while the "contains" and "ends with" rules trigger the IF branch. Reason: The mapping between judgment rules and branches is reversely bound, and the logical relationship is not correctly matched.
- Phenomenon: Core fields are empty after form submission, which cannot provide effective matching basis for party building learning Q&A. Reason: Mandatory field verification is not enabled, or the verification rules do not cover key information such as case number and on-site location.
How to confirm the configuration is correct
Submit a test form. Check whether mixed input of preset options and custom input is supported. Confirm that the formInput module works normally. Trigger knowledge base retrieval. Confirm that the number of returned results meets the configured single search upper limit requirement. Intentionally leave core fields blank when submitting the form. Check whether a verification prompt pops up. Confirm that the verification rules take effect. View the running logs of the workflow judgment module. Confirm that the branch triggered by the rule matches the expected result.
The values given are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.