Data Profile for This Category
Data for this category primarily comes from the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission investment supervision system, enterprise ERP and project management systems, industry market data, audit and financial statements. The update frequency is quarterly.
Daily documents include annual investment plans, project proposals, feasibility study reports, due diligence reports, asset appraisal reports, and post-investment evaluation reports. Most document structures include fields such as project number, project initiation approval information, financial calculation data, and post-investment operation indicators. Single document length varies widely, ranging from thousands to tens of thousands of characters.
Constraints on Citation Sources and Traceability
Quarterly update frequency requires the knowledge base to complete full or incremental synchronization each quarter. This ensures the timeliness of cited data, and avoids state-owned asset losses or accountability from using expired cited data.
Wide variation in document length requires adapting chunking processing to content of different lengths. This prevents splitting critical approval or financial information, which would cause missing traceability.
Multi-source data from different channels such as supervision systems and ERP systems requires configuring exclusive identification fields for each source. This ensures precise matching to original documents from the corresponding system during traceability.
Project data in the party building learning scenario involves state-owned assets supervision requirements. The traceability chain must fully retain source information to meet compliance review needs.
This category focuses on capital investment and state-owned asset preservation, differing from other business management categories. It requires prioritizing retention of traceability information for documents related to board investment decisions and negative lists.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Single search limit | Top 6–10 entries | This category covers full-cycle project documents, including project initiation, feasibility study, post-evaluation and other stages. This avoids missing critical information |
| Similarity threshold | 0.62–0.78 | Adapts to multi-source heterogeneous project data, balances recall accuracy and coverage, and prevents recalling redundant non-investment documents |
quoteMaxToken | 3500–4500 token | Adapts to the lengthy content of single feasibility study or post-investment evaluation reports, ensuring complete cited fragments can be fully recalled |
| Context window | 11000–16000 characters | Retains sufficient historical conversation and document fragments to support traceability queries for full-cycle project data |
responseData | Enabled | Ensures returned cited content includes complete source metadata, supporting precise traceability |
detail | Enabled | Ensures cited content displays complete document fragments and metadata |
| Source field mapping | Calibrated based on actual testing | Matches identification fields for multi-source data such as the SASAC supervision system and ERP systems in this category, ensuring precise association with original documents during traceability |
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
Three Common Configuration Errors
- Symptom: The number of recalled cited entries remains fixed, and the quantity cannot be increased by adjusting parameters. Cause: The knowledge base only synchronized a portion of quarterly updated documents, or the single search limit was incorrectly set to a fixed value, preventing the recall pool from expanding.
- Symptom: The output cited content does not retain original document format identifiers, and only displays plain text fragments. Cause: Content rendering rules were not configured correctly, or original document format information was lost during chunking.
- Symptom: Unable to associate to the upload field of the corresponding original document via sourceid. Cause: Exclusive fields such as project number and document type for this category were not mapped, preventing precise matching of original data during traceability.
How to Confirm Configuration Is Complete
- Initiate a party building learning Q&A query targeting annual investment plans. Check if returned citation sources include the system identifier and update time of the corresponding document.
- Adjust the value of the single search limit, and observe if the number of recalled citations changes, verifying that the parameter configuration takes effect.
- Upload a test post-investment evaluation report, initiate a relevant query, and confirm that cited content can be associated with the sourceid and field information of this test document.
- View the knowledge base synchronization log, confirm that full or incremental data synchronization has been completed each quarter, ensuring the timeliness of cited data.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.