What this category of data looks like
The data sources for this category include enterprise contract management systems, compliance risk databases, legal and regulatory repositories, case management systems, and reporting platforms. The update frequency is monthly. Daily documents include compliance risk lists, contract legal review opinions, major issue legal opinions, compliance review forms, and violation report investigation reports. Data fields cover risk category, review opinion number, clue disposal status, file size, and other items. No additional statistical values or percentage-based content is included.
Constraints on the "Forms and Interactions" link
The monthly data update cycle requires that the synchronization cycle of the knowledge base linked to the form aligns with the monthly schedule, to avoid frequent synchronization consuming system resources. The structural differences across multiple document types require the form to support dynamic loading of dedicated fields. For example, the compliance review form must be configured with contract number and risk level fields, while the violation report investigation report must be configured with clue source and disposal progress fields. The most time-consuming risk identification, review, and clue investigation processes require the interaction flow to provide preset options to assist data entry and reduce manual input costs. The significant potential consequences of errors require the form to add verification steps to intercept invalid or non-compliant input, while preventing leakage of redundant historical conversation content.
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
How to Set the Configuration
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Form input field verification | Enable required field verification, use "Please complete compliance-related information" as the error prompt text | Match the required field requirements of compliance review forms and violation report investigation reports, avoid invalid submissions |
| Knowledge base synchronization cycle | Set to monthly, synchronization window is 00:00 to 02:00 on the 1st of each month | The data update frequency of this category is monthly, avoid frequent synchronization consuming system resources |
| Conversation context truncation | Retain the last 2 rounds of conversation content, discard redundant historical conversation information | Avoid outputting content from the previous AI conversation, meet the information simplification requirements in compliance scenarios |
userSelect option configuration | Preset options such as compliance risk category, reporting clue type, support custom addition | Match the risk category and clue type fields in daily documents, improve entry efficiency |
formInput content verification | Enable sensitive word filtering to block non-compliant expressions | Avoid improper content input in legal compliance scenarios, reduce compliance risks |
| Knowledge base recall upper limit | Top 5 matching results | Control the returned content length, avoid exceeding the model context limit, while covering major compliance risk points |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Redundant content from the previous AI conversation appears in the conversation results. The cause is that the conversation context truncation rule is not configured, resulting in complete historical conversation being brought into the current context.
- A "field format error" prompt appears after the form is submitted. The cause is that the format verification rule is not configured for the dedicated fields of the compliance review form, resulting in invalid input being submitted.
- The phrase "Citation mark: [1]" appears in the knowledge base recall results. The cause is that the output configuration of the knowledge base citation mark is not turned off, resulting in the source mark of the retrieval result being brought into the conversation content.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Submit a simulated compliance review form, check whether the preset intercept prompt is triggered when required fields are not filled in.
- Initiate two consecutive AI conversations, check whether the final output only includes the content of the current round of conversation.
- Retrieve content from the compliance risk database, check whether the citation mark phrase is not displayed in the returned results.
- Configure a keyword interception rule, enter the preset keyword, check whether the custom interface reply logic is triggered.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader’s own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.