Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
What the Data for This Category Looks Like
The data for this category mainly comes from the budget management integrated system, department staff establishment system, prior year final accounts, project repository, and Ministry of Finance budget preparation notices. Some data includes party building activity expense calculation content. Daily processed documents include department budget drafts, project application documents, performance target forms, staff expense calculation forms, budget approvals. Party building-related expenses must be marked separately. Data updates follow an annual cycle. Core fields cover staff public expenses, project expenditure amounts, performance target scores, party building activity expense standards, and more. The data structure is built around the annual fund declaration and allocation logic.
Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on Multi-turn Dialogue and Prompt Engineering
The party building learning Q&A scenario requires multi-turn dialogue to cover both fiscal budget preparation specifications and party building-led expense use requirements. Context must retain both business-related and party building-related historical questions. The annual updated data feature requires multi-turn dialogue to bind the current budget year context, to avoid cross-year data confusion. Multiple data sources require prompts to clearly distinguish execution data from the budget management integrated system and reserve data from the project repository, to prevent incorrect document calls. The document structure with many professional fields requires multi-turn dialogue to retain specific calculation items, declaring units, party building expense proportion and other information mentioned by users, to avoid repeated confirmation. The consequences of budget preparation errors are clear. Prompts must embed audit and verification logic to ensure dialogue-generated content meets fiscal and party building-related requirements.
How to Configure
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
chatId | Bind a unique string tied to the current budget unit + annual preparation | Ensure multi-turn dialogue context is bound to a specific budget unit and year, to avoid cross-batch confusion |
messages | Retain the most recent 10 rounds of dialogue content | Department budget preparation documents are voluminous; too much historical content will occupy context resources, while too little will lose context related to audits and party building |
variables | Pass the current budget year, number of unit staff, party building activity expense quota limit | Allow prompts to directly call business-specific parameters, reduce repeated input, and adapt to the composite scenario combining party building and budget preparation |
| Maximum context length | 8000–12000 token | Average length of documents related to department budget preparation, ensuring complete annual preparation notices and declaration templates can be loaded |
| Single search limit | Top 3 matching results | Core data is concentrated in the budget management integrated system and project repository; too many results will interfere with prompt judgment of composite professional and party building questions |
| Question optimization switch | Enabled | For professional terms combining party building and budget preparation, optimization can improve the dialogue's understanding accuracy of composite questions |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: The
messagesfield is empty when calling the dialogue interface, and multi-turn dialogue context is lost. Cause: ThechatIdparameter is not bound, so the system cannot associate historical records of the corresponding session, and cannot load previous budget and party building-related questions. - Phenomenon: Parameter verification errors occur during application operation, and exception logs are not recorded. Cause: Dialogue log collection configuration is not enabled, so key parameter content such as
chatIdandmessagesat the time of the exception cannot be traced back. - Phenomenon: Prompts do not cover party building expense-related requirements as expected, and generated content deviates from business specifications. Cause: Exclusive parameters such as party building activity expense quota limit are not passed in
variables, so prompts cannot complete verification combined with party building requirements.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Correct
- Initiate a test question with historical context, verify that the system can correctly associate the previously mentioned budget year and party building expense-related requirements.
- Trigger an exception error, check whether corresponding log entries are generated, including complete content of the
chatIdandmessagesfields. - Review the prompt configuration, confirm that
variablesincludes core business and party building-related parameters required for current budget preparation. - Test multi-turn dialogue, ensure the system can correctly call matching budget preparation documents, with no irrelevant content mixed in.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.