What this category of data looks like
This category covers party building learning Q&A scenarios. Core data comes from the budget management integrated system, department staff establishment system, prior year final accounts, project library, Ministry of Finance budget preparation documents, and party building-related policy notices. The update frequency is annual. Documents processed include department budget drafts, project application forms, performance target statements, personnel expense calculation forms, and budget approvals. Data fields include budget year, unit code, project details, fund amount, performance indicators, and more. There is no unified fixed cross-entity format, and data must be organized according to the reporting unit's filling rules.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the "conversation logs and auditing" link
This category of data is sourced from core fiscal business systems and party building policy content. The content links annual fund arrangements and party building learning requirements. Errors will result in budget returns, projects being unable to secure funding, and other adverse outcomes. Therefore, all interaction links must be fully retained in conversation logs, and arbitrary deletion is prohibited. The data update frequency is annual, so the log retention period must match the budget year span. Since most processed documents are structured tables and policy notices, logs must be linked to specific document fragments and field information. Identifiers such as chatId and responseChatItemId must also be recorded to facilitate audit tracing and verification of party building learning content.
How to configure the settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chatId binding rule | Bind budget unit code, budget year, and party building learning batch | Group and trace by entity, cycle, and learning scenario, aligning with fiscal and party building management logic |
| Log retention period | 12–18 months | Cover the full annual budget preparation and party building learning process, meeting audit tracing requirements |
detail log switch | Enable full interaction and party building policy association recording | Fully retain conversation context, document fields, and policy reference information related to party building learning |
responseChatItemId display rule | Display in session chain order | Restore the complete interaction process, facilitating audit verification of the connection between each round of Q&A and party building learning content |
| Permission verification configuration | Divide by budget management and party building learning roles | Restrict access to sensitive logs, complying with fiscal and party building data security requirements |
Three common misconfigurations
- Symptom: Prompt "No permission to operate this conversation record". Cause: Log access permissions are not configured according to budget management and party building learning roles, or the bound
chatIdis not associated with the corresponding unit code and learning batch, resulting in failed permission verification. - Symptom: After upgrading the version and refreshing the conversation page, front-end conversation records disappear but can still be viewed in the back-end. Cause: Session cache persistence for
responseChatItemIdis not enabled in the configuration, or the session storage path is not bound to the budget year and party building learning batch dimensions, resulting in cache failure after version upgrade. - Symptom: Call count statistics for party building classification questions are empty. Cause: The field extraction configuration for
detaillogs is not enabled, and the association information between classification tags and call counts is not recorded, resulting in missing statistical data.
How to confirm the configuration is correctly set up
- Initiate a Q&A that combines party building policies and department budget drafts, check the back-end logs, confirm that
chatIdis bound to the current budget unit code, budget year, and party building learning batch. - Verify accounts with different permission roles, confirm that only conversation logs within the corresponding jurisdiction and related to the party building learning batch can be viewed, with no unauthorized access.
- Check the log storage directory, confirm that the retention period meets the budget year and party building learning cycle span, and no automatic early cleanup rules are set.
- Trigger a call for a party building classification question, confirm that the association information between classification identifiers and interaction times is recorded in the
detaillog.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.