What the data for this category looks like
The data sources for party building learning Q&A for state-owned capital investment companies mainly include internal party committee archived documents, party building guidance manuals released by superior state-owned asset supervision institutions, monthly branch learning materials, and annual party building work summaries. Update frequency follows these rules: immediate synchronization for superior policy documents, monthly updates for internal learning materials, and quarterly updates for annual summary documents. The structure of a single document includes issuing authority, release date, document topic, and main content. Fields include unified source identifier, release timestamp, and document classification tags. Single document content is counted in characters. Bulk imported datasets are stored in megabytes (MB).
What constraints these characteristics bring to citation sources and traceability
Party building data for state-owned capital investment companies is scattered across internal archives and public documents from superior regulatory agencies. Differences in document formats and release times across sources create constraints for citation traceability. First, configure a unique identifier field for each source to avoid confusion between similar documents from different channels. Second, use document release time as a required field for traceability display, to meet the requirement for policy timeliness in party building learning. Third, the difference in single document length and bulk dataset scale requires limiting the total character count of recall results, to prevent exceeding model context limits. Additionally, the authority of party building documents requires that traceability information must accurately match the original document’s issuing authority and document number, without arbitrary modification of identifiers.
How to set the configuration
| Config Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
quoteMaxToken | 800–1200 characters | Matches the average length of party building documents for state-owned capital investment companies, ensures complete traceability content without exceeding model context limits |
responseData | Only return issuing authority, release date, and document title fields | Focuses on core traceability information for party building documents, avoids redundant content interfering with display |
detail | Enabled | Ensures traceability content includes complete release information for the document, meets the need for detailed verification of policy basis in party building learning |
| Single recall limit | Top 3 entries | Adapts to the accuracy requirements of party building learning Q&A, avoids user confusion from excessive sources |
| Source data filtering | Retain valid documents from the last 90 days | Ensures displayed party building content complies with current policy requirements, removes outdated archived files |
| Chunk length | 400–600 characters | Adapts to the paragraph structure of party building documents, ensures complete semantics and traceability information are retained after chunking |
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
Three common configuration mistakes
- Phenomenon: Different sources of party building documents cannot be distinguished in logs, and duplicate source identifiers appear. Cause: Unique source identifier fields are not configured for documents from different channels, leading to confusion between internal files and superior regulatory documents during traceability.
- Phenomenon: The large model output includes the phrase "Citation Mark: [1]". Cause: Output filtering rules are not configured correctly, or the default display switch for original citation marks is not turned off.
- Phenomenon: Outdated policy documents are recalled in party building document results, and automatic filtering fails. Cause: Source data filtering rules are not configured, or the filtering time interval is set too long, leading to recall of old files.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Initiate a query related to party building learning, check that the traceability section of the output only displays issuing authority, release date, and document title, with no redundant technical marks or irrelevant fields.
- View background logs, confirm that each recalled document has a unique source identifier that can be directly mapped to the storage location of the original data.
- Test a query for a timely party building policy, confirm that all recalled documents were released within the last 90 days, with no outdated files.
- Adjust the value of
quoteMaxToken, verify that the length of the output traceability content matches the configured range.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.