What data for this category looks like
Data for this category primarily comes from the health supervision information system, medical institution electronic registration system, complaint reporting platform, and law enforcement inspection records, with a monthly update frequency. Daily processed documents include supervision inspection forms, medical institution practice licenses, rectification notices, supervision opinions, and penalty case files. Data fields focus on institutional qualifications, on-site inspection status, rectification tracking, and penalty information, stored in a structured manner by business scenario, with no additional statistical quantitative data.
What constraints do these characteristics bring to the forms and interactions link
Since data sources for this category are scattered and updated monthly, the forms and interactions link must adapt to field differences across multiple document types, and support dynamic loading of form templates for different business scenarios. Daily work requires verifying institutional qualifications, nosocomial infection disinfection, and other content. Forms must include built-in field verification rules to avoid missing key information. At the same time, data is associated with law enforcement inspection records and rectification tracking, so the interaction link must support process traceability to ensure that supervision opinions and rectification closed loops can be traced. In addition, errors may result in institutional penalties and practice risks, so the interaction link must strengthen permission control, and only be accessible to corresponding business personnel.
How to configure settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Configured as multi-field linkage mode, associated with three field groups: institutional qualifications, inspection items, and rectification status | Adapt to the form structure of multiple document types in this category, and meet the field call requirements in different scenarios |
userSelect | Limited to two roles: health supervision law enforcement personnel and medical administration management personnel | Ensure that interaction permissions are only open to corresponding business personnel, and avoid unauthorized operations |
| Form submission verification | Enable required field verification and cross-field logical verification | Target key fields such as institutional qualifications and rectification results, to avoid missing core information |
| Data source synchronization cycle | Set to 30 days | Match the monthly update frequency of data in this category, and ensure the timeliness of data called by forms |
| Form submission timeout period | Set to 600 seconds | Adapt to the reasonable duration for data filling during law enforcement inspection, and avoid submission failure due to timeout |
| Interaction traceability configuration | Enable full-process operation log recording | Meet the traceability requirements of supervision and law enforcement processes, and adapt to traceability needs after errors |
Three common misconfigurations
- When configuring DingTalk integration, the prompt "Receiving message address verification failed" appears. Cause: FastGPT service is not deployed to a publicly accessible environment, or SSL certificate verification rules are not configured correctly.
- After adding a
formInputnode to the form, the corresponding business document fields are not associated, resulting in empty submitted data. Cause: The field structure of documents such as supervision inspection forms and rectification notices in this category is not matched, and dynamic template loading is not configured. - When configuring
userSelectrole permissions, the scope of law enforcement personnel and management personnel is not limited, resulting in unauthorized users being able to edit the form. Cause: Permissions are not divided by business roles, and the permission boundary between internal office and external interaction is confused.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Initiate a simulated law enforcement inspection form submission, verify whether the required field verification is triggered and whether cross-field logic takes effect.
- Check the data source synchronization log to confirm that health supervision information system data has been normally pulled within the 30-day cycle.
- Test the message reception of DingTalk integration to verify that the verification prompt is displayed according to the configured rules.
- Check the operation log function to confirm that all operations such as form submission and modification have complete records.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.