What Data for This Category Looks Like
The data for this category typically comes from four sources: the Randomized Inspection and Public Disclosure regulatory platform, Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, industry regulatory systems, and law enforcement officer directory. Data updates occur monthly. Daily documents include inspection plans, inspection target lists, inspection item checklists, on-site inspection records, rectification notices, and inspection result public announcements. Common data fields include the unified social credit code of the inspected entity, law enforcement officer ID number, and inspection item code. No additional custom units are used. Core fields must match the ledger in the regulatory system.
Constraints Imposed on Tool Calling and Plugins Workflows
Monthly updated data sources require scheduled synchronization tasks in tool calling configurations. This prevents use of expired inspection target or law enforcement officer data. Batch-generated inspection tasks must support bulk passing of multiple parameters. This supports scenarios where multiple inspection target entries are processed in a single run. Core fields must align with the regulatory system ledger. Tool calling must enforce mandatory verification of required field completeness. This prevents inspection results from failing public disclosure due to missing fields. The law enforcement officer matching step must call directory data. Permission verification rules for cross-system interfaces must be configured. This ensures compliance of data calls.
How to Configure Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
toolChoice | auto | Adapts to randomly triggered tool calling needs in randomized regulatory oversight scenarios. Automatically matches tools for inspection target matching and result entry |
functionCall | Enable batch mode | Supports passing multiple inspection target entries in a single request. Adapts to business scenarios where inspection tasks are generated in bulk |
| Plugin interface timeout | 300–600 seconds | Matches typical response durations for regulatory system data synchronization. Prevents task interruptions due to cross-system call timeouts |
| Bulk call limit | First 50 entries | Adapts to the scale of monthly updated inspection target lists. Prevents excessive single call data volume from triggering interface rate limits |
| Field verification rules | Mandatory verification of inspection target code and law enforcement officer ID number | Prevents inspection results from failing public disclosure due to missing fields. Meets compliance requirements for regulatory business |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- A
400 <400> InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: The toolerror is returned when calling a tool. The cause is that the format of the passed inspection target code field does not meet the requirements of the regulatory system. The preset field verification rules were not matched. - Only some entries are processed after bulk tool calling. Remaining data is not executed. The cause is that the batch mode parameter for
functionCallwas not configured correctly. This leads to interface rate limit triggers. - A plugin created in the production environment cannot be called in a workflow. The cause is that the plugin was not bound to the corresponding tool calling node. The plugin's permission access scope was not configured.
How to Confirm Successful Configuration
- Initiate a tool call for a single inspection target. Verify that the
toolChoiceconfiguration automatically matches the corresponding tool. Confirm that the returned result includes correct law enforcement officer matching information. - Upload a monthly updated inspection target list. Verify that the
functionCallbatch mode fully processes all entries without data omission. - Trigger a tool call. Check that the regulatory system ledger has been updated with the corresponding fields. Confirm that there are no missing fields or format errors.
- Review plugin runtime logs. Confirm that there are no interface timeout or permission verification failure error messages.
The values provided here are common starting points. They should be evaluated against samples tailored to the specific use case.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.