Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Daily documents for this category include random inspection plans, inspection target lists, inspection item lists, on-site inspection records, rectification notices, and random inspection result announcements. Data sources are the random inspection and public disclosure supervision platform, enterprise credit information public disclosure system, industry supervision system, and law enforcement officer directory. Update frequency is monthly. Common fields include the unified social credit code of supervised entities, law enforcement officer ID number, inspection item entries, and rectification time limit. Common units are entries, person-times, and working days. Typical users are market supervision, housing and urban-rural development, ecological environment, cultural and tourism, human resources and social security, and other supervision departments.
Constraints Imposed on Forms and Interactions
Monthly updated data sources require forms to support bulk import and incremental synchronization functions. This avoids repeated entry of monthly updated inspection target and law enforcement officer data. Multi-field document structures require forms to be displayed in three business segments: inspection preparation, on-site execution, and result announcement. This prevents operational errors caused by overly long single-page forms. Cross-data-source calls for the law enforcement officer directory require forms to integrate personnel selection components. This ensures selected law enforcement officers meet supervision requirements. Required field configuration for inspection result announcements must strictly match public disclosure requirements. This avoids missed public disclosure issues. High-frequency demand for bulk generation of random inspection tasks requires forms to support bulk submission and bulk status updates. This adapts to monthly supervision work rhythms.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Configure in segments by business segment, with no more than 10 fields per segment | Adapt to the multi-field inspection document structure, avoid operational errors caused by overly long forms |
userSelect | Associate with the law enforcement officer directory data source, enable cross-database matching verification | Ensure selected law enforcement officers meet supervision requirements, avoid non-compliant selections |
formInput | Enable unified social credit code format verification | Prevent incorrect entry of inspection target information, avoid errors in subsequent public disclosure |
| Bulk import limit | No more than 500 entries per single import | Adapt to the scale of monthly updated data sources, avoid import timeouts |
| Status flow configuration | Set nodes in the order of inspection preparation → on-site execution → result announcement | Match daily business work processes, facilitate employee tracking of task progress |
| Message notification trigger | Push notifications to internal office channels when task status changes | Remind law enforcement officers of pending tasks in a timely manner, improve collaboration efficiency |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Symptom: An error "receiving message address verification failed" is prompted when configuring internal office channel access. Cause: The service is not deployed to a publicly accessible network environment, or SSL certificate verification rules are not correctly configured.
- Symptom: Some data fails to be recognized when bulk importing inspection target lists. Cause: The field order of the imported file does not match the preset mapping rules of the form, or there are incorrectly formatted unified social credit codes.
- Symptom: Law enforcement officer matching fails when generating random inspection tasks. Cause: The law enforcement officer directory data source is not associated, or the directory data has not been updated monthly, resulting in no available personnel.
How to Verify Correct Configuration
- Manually import a single entry of inspection target data with a valid unified social credit code. Verify whether the system triggers a format compliance prompt.
- Call the law enforcement officer directory data source. Attempt to select two law enforcement officers and generate a test task. Confirm that matching results are accurate.
- Simulate task progression from the inspection preparation node to the result announcement node. Confirm whether the internal office channel receives a status change notification.
- Test bulk import of 50 inspection target data entries. Confirm that the import succeeds and all data is fully synchronized to the system.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own operational samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.