What data for this category includes
Administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, and departmental supervision databases provide data for this category. Data updates daily. Daily documents include on-site inspection records, interrogation records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notification letters, hearing notification letters, penalty decisions, and delivery receipts. The core focus of this data is illegal facts and penalty decisions. A traceable penalty evidence chain and complete document chain must be formed. Fields cover key information such as law enforcement subjects, involved subjects, illegal circumstances, discretion basis, and document numbers.
Constraints on HTTP interfaces and external systems
Scattered data sources include unstructured audio and video content and structured documents. Interfaces must support access to multiple data types. The daily update frequency requires interfaces to have stable batch call capabilities. This prevents data synchronization delays caused by call latency. A large number of documents require strict traceability. Interfaces must carry unique identifiers to link to original law enforcement data. Interfaces must also be compatible with field format differences across different law enforcement systems. Penalty case files have high compliance requirements. Fields returned by interfaces must fully cover law enforcement process nodes. No records of key steps can be omitted.
Configuration settings
These configurations apply to FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setup | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Carry a dedicated token for the law enforcement system, valid for no more than 7 days | Match the permission control requirements of administrative law enforcement data, prevent sensitive case file leaks from token exposure |
variables | Pre-set two fixed parameters: law enforcement subject code and document type code | Simplify repeated entry during interface calls, adapt to batch call scenarios for multiple law enforcement subjects |
responseData | Only return verified core case file fields, do not include originally collected redundant footage data | Reduce interface transmission bandwidth usage, comply with the minimum necessary transmission principle for law enforcement data |
| Timeout threshold | 600 seconds | Adapt to the upload and parsing duration of large-volume data such as law enforcement records and footage |
| Batch call limit | First 10 entries | Match the daily updated case file processing rhythm, avoid overload from single calls |
Three common misconfigurations
- The interface returns a
401 Unauthorizedstatus code. This occurs when theAuthorizationparameter is not configured correctly, or the token has expired and was not updated in time. - The
responseDatafield returned by the interface is missing the delivery receipt number. This occurs when the corresponding document type parameter is not passed during the call, resulting in the interface not returning complete case file fields. - The interface times out during batch calls. This occurs when the number of case files in a single call exceeds the preset limit, and the reasonable timeout threshold was not adjusted.
How to confirm configuration is correct
- Call the interface with the
Authorizationparameter. Verify the return status code is200 OKto confirm the permission configuration is effective. - Check the
responseDatareturned fields. Confirm they include the three core preset fields: law enforcement subject, involved subject, and penalty decision. Verify field completeness. - Initiate a batch call. Check that the number of case files returned by the interface matches the preset call limit. Confirm the batch logic is working properly.
- Wait 24 hours. Check that the case file data synchronized via the interface matches the update records of the law enforcement system. Confirm the scheduled call configuration is effective.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.