What the data for this category looks like
This category’s data comes from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the national enterprise credit information publicity system, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Daily documents include on-site inspection records, interrogation records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notification letters, hearing notification letters, penalty decisions, and service receipts. The core focus is on illegal facts and penalty decisions. Teams must form a traceable penalty evidence chain and complete document chain. Data fields cover law enforcement subject information, illegal circumstance descriptions, discretionary benchmark matching results, and legal review opinions. No additional preset statistical indicators are included.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the forms and interactions link
Decentralized data sources with daily updates require form interactions to support rapid retrieval and verification of multi-source data. Fixed daily document formats and clear fields require form components to match existing law enforcement document fields one-to-one to avoid entry errors. A traceable penalty evidence chain requires the interaction link to retain complete operation logs and field filling records. Internal law enforcement institutions follow legal review processes, so forms must set tiered permission controls to ensure different positions can only edit fields corresponding to their respective links. Consequences of errors include penalty revocation, reconsideration litigation loss, or unsatisfactory case file review. This requires forms to set required field validation and automatic format correction to reduce manual errors.
How to configure settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setup | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput component configuration | Enable required field validation and real-time format validation, limit input length to 100–5000 characters | Match the content length requirements of law enforcement records to reduce entry errors |
userSelect component configuration | Limit optional values to the law enforcement subject directory and penalty type list | Ensure the values of law enforcement subject and penalty type fields comply with regulatory specifications |
| Form field binding | Match one-to-one with the fields of documents such as on-site inspection records and interrogation records | Match the fixed-format law enforcement documents of this category to avoid field misalignment |
| Knowledge base call scope | Bind exclusive knowledge bases corresponding to the target law enforcement field | Accurately match legal and regulatory data for law enforcement scenarios such as market supervision and ecological environment |
| Timeout setting | 300–600 seconds | Adapt to the time consumption requirements of multi-source data retrieval and document generation |
| Single recall count | Top 5–8 entries | Adapt to the retrieval requirements of multiple evidence chains and avoid information overload |
Three common configuration mistakes
- Phenomenon: Blank core fields are submitted even after configuring required field validation for
formInput. Cause: Core document fields such as illegal circumstance descriptions and law enforcement subjects were not added to the validation binding scope, causing the validation logic to fail. - Phenomenon: Only a single result returns when calling the knowledge base. Cause: The single recall count configuration was not adjusted. The default value only matches a single result, which does not adapt to the retrieval requirements of multiple evidence chains for this category.
- Phenomenon: A specified reply triggers after text extraction fails, but the process does not wait for user input of new content. Cause: The workflow's user wait node configuration was not enabled, and the interaction process terminates directly, which does not meet the operational needs of law enforcement personnel for supplementary information.
How to confirm successful configuration
- Open the form editing page and verify that bound fields exactly match the fields of law enforcement documents such as on-site inspection records and interrogation records.
- Test the required field validation of the
formInputcomponent: intentionally leave blank core fields, submit, and confirm that the corresponding prompt triggers. - Switch accounts of different positions and test whether only form fields within the corresponding permission range can be edited.
- Trigger the text extraction failure scenario and confirm that the process pauses and waits for the user to input new content.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.