What the data for this category looks like
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Workflow Orchestration
Scattered data sources and irregular update cycles require workflow orchestration to support dynamic calls to multiple data sources, avoiding hard-coded fixed interfaces. Diverse document structures and non-fixed fields require configuration of variables to adapt to field extraction for different documents, supporting custom variable mapping. Links for comparing upper-level laws and summarizing opinions take extended time, so reasonable node timeouts and branch judgments must be set to prevent process blocking. Error outcomes directly impact policy release and filing compliance, so validation nodes must be added to the workflow to block non-compliant documents from proceeding to subsequent stages.
How to Set Configurations
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Variable Binding | Bind variables to document number and drafting unit fields | Adapt to custom field extraction requirements for different documents in this category, support adaptation to multiple document formats |
| Node Timeout Setting | 600 seconds | Cover the actual execution duration of time-consuming review links such as upper-level law comparison and opinion summarization |
| Form Node Configuration | Support uploading audit attachments up to 100 MB | Match the upload requirements for documents such as review opinions and filing reports in this category |
| Branch Judgment Rules | Trigger pass/rejection workflows based on compliance check results | Avoid business risks that affect policy release after errors occur |
| Data Source Association | Bind preset regulatory rule repositories and upper-level law databases | Correspond to the characteristics of fixed but scattered data sources for this category |
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: Global variables do not take effect when calling the published workflow interface externally, and corresponding fields are empty. Cause: The external parameter switch for the
variablesparameter is not enabled in the workflow configuration, and interface input parameters are not bound to workflow variables. - Phenomenon: Timeout errors occur during workflow execution, and the system returns status code 504. Cause: Node timeout settings are too short, failing to cover the actual execution duration of time-consuming links such as upper-level law comparison and opinion summarization.
- Phenomenon: Custom variables cannot be added, or text splicing results do not match expectations. Cause: Variables are not configured in accordance with the naming rules of the
variablesparameter, or the variable binding order does not match the document field order.
How to Confirm Configurations Are Correct
- Trigger workflow testing, upload simulated regulatory document drafts, and check whether fields bound to
variablesare correctly extracted to corresponding nodes. - Call the external interface to pass preset global variables, and check whether the workflow correctly receives and uses these variables.
- Simulate a scenario where compliance check fails, and confirm whether the workflow triggers the rejection branch and generates corresponding review opinions.
- View workflow execution logs, and confirm that the execution duration of each node does not exceed the preset 600-second timeout setting.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.