What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category originates from SIEM, EDR, firewall logs, and host images. Update frequency is real-time or per single event. Daily produced documents include incident response reports, forensic records, remediation plans, and notification materials. Fields cover attack paths, isolation operation records, and evidence chain nodes. There are no fixed unified units; values adjust based on incident scenarios. Associated entities include security operation centers, incident response engineers, and customer security leads. Content must be updated in real time alongside remediation progress to ensure evidence chain integrity and timeliness.
Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on the Citation Sources and Traceability Link
Multi-source heterogeneous data sources require the traceability link to support cross-system correlation. This avoids missing information from single data sources. Real-time or per-event update frequency requires traceability context to sync with current remediation progress. Excessively long historical data increases processing latency. Diverse document types and flexible field structures require citation matching rules to adapt to content formats of different documents. Unified matching templates cannot be used. The core goal of this category is to complete incident remediation and evidence preservation. Traceability results must be supported by clear timestamps and operation records. This has a clear difference from alert traceability for real-time monitoring categories.
Configuration Settings
The following configurations are based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value Range | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
quoteMaxToken | 8000–12000 token | Adapts to the total length of multi-source logs and documents, avoids truncation of critical evidence due to token limit exceedance |
responseData | Return only associated logs and forensic record fields | Filters internal system metadata, focuses on attack paths and isolation records required for incident response |
detail | Enable full field display | Retains critical traceability fields in logs such as timestamps and source IPs, meets evidence chain organization needs |
| Single recall limit | Top 10 entries | Controls the number of returned results, avoids redundant information interfering with attack path restoration |
| Context window length | Event data within 600 seconds | Matches real-time event update rhythm, ensures traceability data syncs with current remediation progress |
Three Common Configuration Errors
- Phenomenon: Generated replies forcibly display "No permission to operate this conversation record" at the end and cannot be canceled. Cause:
responseDatafiltering rules are not configured correctly. Internal system conversation metadata is mistakenly included in returned content. - Phenomenon: Newline characters
\nmentioned in prompts are output as plain text, with no line break effect applied. Cause: The format parsing switch in thedetailconfiguration is not enabled, leading to incorrect handling of special characters. - Phenomenon: The number of traceability result entries exceeds expectations, making it impossible to focus on critical evidence. Cause: No reasonable single recall limit is set, leading to batch recall of redundant logs that interfere with attack path restoration.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Manually import a single firewall log and host image data, trigger a traceability query, and check if returned content only includes associated incident response-related fields, with no excess system metadata.
- Input a prompt containing
\n, verify that line breaks in the reply work correctly, and confirm format parsing configuration is correct. - Adjust the value of
quoteMaxToken, test multi-source log combinations of different lengths, and confirm no token limit exceedance errors occur. - Check the context window setting in the configuration interface, confirm its value matches the real-time event update rhythm, and avoid introducing expired historical data.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.