What the data for this category looks like
The data for this category primarily comes from SIEM, EDR, NDR, and threat intelligence sources. Update cycles fall into two categories: real-time and daily. Documents processed daily include alarm disposal sheets, duty records, threat intelligence bulletins, and daily/weekly reports. A single alarm disposal sheet includes fields for alarm ID, trigger time, associated assets, disposal steps, and responsible person. Duty records include fields for duty period, abnormal event entries, and handover content. Threat intelligence bulletins include fields for threat type, impact scope, and update time. Most data fields are tightly bound to security operation events, with no redundant business fields.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the conversation logs and auditing link
The real-time and daily update cycles require the conversation logs and auditing link to support real-time interaction capture and scheduled batch archiving of records. Multiple data sources require audit logs to associate unique identifiers from SIEM, EDR, and other data sources. This ensures every analysis operation can be traced to a specific security event. The structured fields of documents such as alarm disposal sheets and duty records require logs to bind chatId, responseChatItemId, and the corresponding security event ID. This prevents interaction records from being disconnected from events. The risks of false positive accumulation and missed reports require the auditing link to fully reproduce the full conversation content of alarm analysis and escalation dispatching.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chatId binding rule | Bind to SIEM alarm ID or duty record number | Ensure each conversation record corresponds to a unique security event, to facilitate audit tracing |
responseChatItemId storage rule | Associate with the interaction node of a single analysis | Facilitate locating the complete analysis conversation chain for a single alarm |
Log detail field configuration | Retain complete interaction context, including original alarm information and analysis steps | Cover full process records required for security compliance review |
| Context retention period | 90 days | Meet audit retention requirements for security compliance |
| Maximum number of interactions per session | First 20 interactions | Avoid redundant log storage usage, while covering the complete analysis process |
| FastGPT version | FastGPT v4.17.0 | Adapt to the current version's log storage and auditing APIs |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: When calling the API, conversation logs only display title fields, with no complete interaction content. Cause: The complete storage rule for the
detailfield is not configured, and only document title metadata is synced. - Symptom: Conversation logs cannot be associated with specific security events, and entries with empty
chatIdappear. Cause:chatIdis not bound to SIEM alarm ID or duty record number, causing interaction records to be disconnected from security events. - Symptom: Intermediate steps of alarm analysis cannot be viewed in audit logs, only final conclusions are displayed. Cause:
responseChatItemIdis not configured to associate with single interaction nodes, causing the conversation chain to be truncated.
How to Confirm Configuration Completion
- Initiate an alarm analysis conversation, and check if the
chatIdfield bound to the corresponding alarm ID exists in the logs. - View the
detailfield of audit logs, confirm that it contains complete interaction content such as original alarm information and analysis steps. - Verify the coreference resolution function for historical conversations, confirm that current questions can be associated with previously mentioned alarm IDs or asset information.
- Check the retention period of log storage, confirm that it meets the preset compliance retention requirements.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against samples from the deploying environment.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.