This document is compatible with FastGPT v4.17.0.
What This Category of Data Looks Like
Data for this category originates primarily from advertising platform backends, customer qualification documents, contract systems, and publicly available regulatory rules. Core documents processed daily fall into four categories: advertising review forms, qualification attachments, delivery records, and rectification notices. Data updates follow a single advertising campaign or natural monthly cycle, with no fixed high-frequency update rhythm. Data fields include activity identifiers, qualification numbers, delivery time periods, review results, rectification status, and more. Fields and units adjust dynamically based on the associated document type, with no unified fixed format.
Constraints for Conversation Logs and Auditing Workflows
This category of data has long, non-high-frequency update cycles. Conversation logs must support archiving by advertising activity dimension to avoid redundant storage consuming resources. Documents such as delivery records and rectification notices are tied to specific advertising activities. The auditing process must bind chatId to link corresponding activity data, ensuring accurate traceability. Qualification attachments are mostly unstructured files. Auditing must support retrieving conversation context associated with attachments via the detail field. Regulatory requirements mandate that logs cannot be tampered with, so log modification permissions must be restricted. Given flexible update cycles, support must be provided for retrieving historical conversation nodes via responseChatItemId. Compliance processes vary significantly across different business entities. Auditing configurations must support flexible adjustment of field mapping rules for associated documents.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chatId | Bind to the unique identifier of the advertising activity | Ensure conversation logs are linked to delivery records and review forms for the corresponding advertising activity, enabling precise traceability |
responseChatItemId | Generate a unique ID per single review node | Corresponds to the complete interaction flow for a single compliance review, facilitating retrieval of details for individual records |
detail | Store the path and field information of associated documents | Record associated information for files such as qualification attachments and rectification notices, supporting quick retrieval of original materials during audits |
| Maximum conversation context count | Keep the first 20–50 entries | Match the monthly update cycle of advertising compliance logging, avoiding excessive redundant history interfering with current review logic |
| Log archiving cycle | Set to campaign cycle + 12 months | Meet long-term archiving requirements for regulatory logging, adapting to the update rhythm per campaign or monthly cycle |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: After setting the number of chat history entries to 6, the model cannot retrieve context from the previous round of questions. Cause:
chatIdis not bound to the conversation chain for the corresponding advertising activity, leading to incorrect context truncation or cross-activity confusion. - Symptom: The history record interface returns a credential error. Cause: Associated qualification files are not loaded per the credential verification rule configured via the
detailfield, causing the system to fail to verify call permissions. - Symptom: Conversation logs for corresponding delivery records cannot be found during audits. Cause:
responseChatItemIdis not used to link review nodes and delivery records, causing logs to be disconnected from business data.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Manually create a conversation log for a test advertising activity, verify that the
chatIdfield matches the activity identifier. - Call the historical conversation interface, check whether the returned results include qualification attachment information associated with the
detailfield. - View the log storage directory, confirm that the archiving cycle meets the requirement of campaign cycle + 12 months.
- Simulate a credential verification process, verify that the interface call can correctly read review node data associated with
responseChatItemId.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the user's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.