This document applies to FastGPT v4.17.0
What the data for this category looks like
Core data for this category comes from client system interfaces, API documentation, test data, and integration logs. Update frequency follows a daily or per-phase integration cycle. Daily maintenance covers interface lists, integration records, field mapping tables, and issue tracking tables. Data fields include interface unique identifiers, request parameters, return fields, call frequency, error codes, and mapping relationships. Units include call counts, byte counts, status codes, and similar metrics.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the citation sources and traceability link
To address the multi-source dynamic data characteristics of interface integration and data docking, the traceability link must bind specific interfaces and timestamps for each call. This binding ensures compliance reviews can trace back to the original docking link. The complexity of field mapping requires the traceability system to retain complete field correspondence relationships, avoiding data synchronization risks. Frequently updated integration logs and interface documents require the traceability system to pull the latest metadata version in real time, ensuring the accuracy of review basis. Complete retention of abnormal data from single calls facilitates subsequent troubleshooting of business interruptions or acceptance failures.
How to Configure Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale for This Setting |
|---|---|---|
| Single Traceability Recall Count | Top 10 entries | Balances storage load of integration records and traceability coverage |
quoteMaxToken | 1200–1800 token | Adapts to the single-item content length of interface documents and integration logs, ensures complete retention of traceability information |
responseData | Enable full return | Retains original interface return data for compliance verification and exception troubleshooting |
detail | Enable detailed mode | Records field mappings and call link details, meets detailed requirements for security reviews |
| Source Binding Rule | Associate by interface unique identifier | Matches standardized naming rules of interface lists, ensures traceability points to specific docking interfaces |
| Traceability Query Timeout Threshold | 30 seconds | Adapts to typical response durations of interface integration, avoids query blocking |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- After configuring interface integration and testing for errors, forcibly ignoring the error allows the system to run, but only returns 1 knowledge base document. The cause is that
detailwas not correctly configured to enable detailed mode. Only basic integration information is loaded, and complete knowledge base traceability data is not associated. - After importing a JSON-format knowledge base, the interface dropdown menu is empty, and the target knowledge base cannot be selected directly. The cause is that
responseDatafull return configuration was not enabled, so traceability cannot read metadata information of the knowledge base. - Knowledge base citation limit is insufficient, and more compliant documents cannot be recalled. The cause is that
quoteMaxTokenis set too low, causing the token usage of the traceability context to exceed the limit, truncating traceability records for subsequent documents.
How to Confirm Configuration is Complete
- Initiate an interface integration test, check whether the returned results include complete integration logs, field mapping information, and interface metadata.
- View the citation source panel, confirm that each traceability entry is bound to the corresponding interface ID and call timestamp.
- Adjust the value range of
quoteMaxToken, verify whether the number of recallable knowledge base documents meets expectations. - Simulate an abnormal call scenario, check whether specific interface addresses and returned error codes can be located through traceability information.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against samples corresponding to the actual use case.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.