What this category of data looks like
This category of data is generated across the full publication declaration workflow for a single game. It includes core documents such as declaration request files, game application forms, copyright certificates, and review reports. Data sources include official government service platforms for game publication declarations, copyright registration systems, game package files, and supporting materials submitted by operating institutions. Data update frequency adjusts irregularly based on the declaration progress of each individual game. Each game has a separate set of declaration materials, with no universal bulk update logic. Fields include declaration subject information, game qualification numbers, review conclusions, submission times, and other details. These must match the exclusive requirements of a single declaration, with no unified fixed bulk field format.
What constraints these characteristics impose on conversation logs and auditing
The independence of single-game declaration materials requires conversation logs to bind the chatId of the corresponding declaration project, to avoid cross-project log confusion. The irregular update characteristic requires audit logs to support filtering by declaration batches, and cannot rely on fixed-cycle bulk audit rules. The mixed multi-source data characteristic requires the audit workflow to record the original source identifier of data imports, to ensure every log can be traced back to the corresponding business channel. The need to verify consistency between review reports and application forms requires conversation logs to include full question-and-answer interaction processes, to facilitate tracing the basis and timeline of material modifications. The requirement for operation traces across different roles requires logs to record the operating subject and operation time, to meet traceability requirements for compliance reviews.
How to configure settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chatId binding rule | Bind the unique project ID of a single game declaration | Match the independence characteristic of single-game declaration materials, avoid cross-project log confusion |
| Audit log retention period | 180–365 days | Meet compliance archiving requirements for publication declaration materials, cover the full cycle from preliminary local review to final approval |
| Log detail recording switch | Enable full detail recording | Meet the traceability requirements for material consistency verification, fully retain question-and-answer interaction processes |
| Log filtering dimension | Filter by declaration batch associated with responseChatItemId | Adapt to the irregular declaration update rhythm, support quick retrieval by single game or batch |
| Source identifier configuration | Record the original channel of data imports | Match the mixed multi-source data characteristic, ensure every log can be traced back to the corresponding business system |
Three common configuration errors
- Phenomenon: The question-and-answer pair extraction task continuously displays "training in progress", and no corresponding interaction records appear in the call logs. Cause: The
chatIdassociated with the declaration project is not bound, so the system cannot match the log trigger conditions for the corresponding task, resulting in no valid execution entry for the task. - Phenomenon: Cross-declaration batch content confusion occurs when searching audit logs. Cause: The batch filtering dimension configured with
responseChatItemIdis not used, causing declaration logs from different games to be grouped into the same search results. - Phenomenon: An error occurs due to exceeding log storage quota. Cause: A reasonable log retention period is not set, and all historical logs are retained without restriction, exceeding the storage limit for compliance archiving.
How to confirm configuration is active
Under FastGPT v4.17.0, confirm active configuration with these actionable steps:
- Create a declaration conversation for a single game, check if the generated logs automatically bind the
chatIdidentifier of the corresponding project, to confirm the binding rule is active. - Enter the audit log management page, attempt to filter logs by declaration batch, to confirm that
responseChatItemIdcan be used to quickly locate corresponding content. - View the detail page of a single log, confirm that the
detailfield includes the full question-and-answer interaction process and data source identifier. - Check storage quota and retention period settings, confirm that the log retention cycle meets compliance requirements, and that unrestricted retention is not enabled.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.