What the data for this category looks like
Data for this category primarily comes from the operation backend, player segments, payment data, and activity logs. Daily produced documents include activity plans, reward configuration tables, launch checklists, and activity post-mortems. Update frequency is mostly weekly or ad-hoc adjustments before holiday events. Data fields include activity unique identifier, reward type, distribution threshold, effective time window, and trigger rules. Units include units, yuan, hours, and others. Some configurations need to match interface parameters of the live game version.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the "citation sources and traceability" link
Multi-source data access requires citation traceability to clearly link to operation backend configurations, player segment tags, payment data statistics, and activity log records, to avoid configuration confusion across data sources. The weekly or ad-hoc update rhythm requires the traceability system to support quick location of the last modification time and operator, ensuring adjustment basis can be traced during compliance reviews. The need to associate multiple types of documents requires the traceability chain to bind rule descriptions in activity plans, numerical details in reward configuration tables, and verification results in launch checklists, covering full-process compliance basis. The diversity of fields requires traceability to match unique identifiers such as activity ID, ensuring cited materials correspond one-to-one with specific configuration items.
How to set the configuration
The following configurations are formulated based on the parameter logic of FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum citation token count | 800–1200 token | Core documents for game operation activities mostly fall within this range, which can fully cover key cited content of activity rules and reward configurations |
| Return data scope | Only return the first 3 associated source fields | Filter non-essential redundant data, only retain fields necessary for traceability such as activity ID and reward value |
| Citation detail display | Display source document fragments | Compliance verification of game configurations requires checking original wording, and fragment display allows quick verification of citation accuracy |
| Citation source binding rule | Associate by activity unique identifier | Match the unified activity ID of activity plans and reward configuration tables, ensuring the traceability chain corresponds one-to-one with specific activities |
| Context retention duration | 7 days | The compliance review cycle for game operation activities usually covers the entire activity cycle, and a 7-day retention duration matches conventional post-mortem requirements |
| Timeout wait time | 60 seconds | Configuration review for game operation activities usually requires rapid response, and a 60-second wait duration can cover the retrieval needs of multi-source data |
Three common misconfigurations
- Citation links fail to display normally after configuration, only empty fields are returned. The cause is that the activity unique identifier was not correctly bound as the association key, causing the traceability system to fail to match corresponding documents and configuration items.
- The settings for the variable citation function disappear, and citation parameters cannot be adjusted. The cause is that the
quoteMaxTokenconfiguration parameter was not retained when switching multi-source data access, causing the relevant interface controls to be hidden. - Cited content exceeds the preset length and is truncated, making detailed reward configurations unable to be fully displayed. The cause is that the value of the
detailparameter does not match the actual length of the activity document, causing key configuration information to be omitted.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Import a test activity plan and reward configuration table, check whether the citation traceability module correctly associates the corresponding document fragments and fields.
- Simulate an activity configuration modification operation, verify whether the traceability chain records the modification time, operator, and modification content.
- Adjust the value of the citation parameters, check whether the system returns cited content according to the set range, with no truncation or redundant data.
- Verify that the cited source data comes from specified sources such as the operation backend and activity logs, ensuring no irrelevant data is mixed in.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.