What the data for this category looks like
This category’s data primarily comes from business systems, App permission lists, privacy policies, and user request records, and is maintained by privacy compliance teams, security consultants, or legal departments. Daily processed documents include personal information lists, processing rules, impact assessment reports, and user authorization texts. Teams update this data quarterly or whenever the product version changes. The core of the data revolves around information that can identify a natural person. Teams must complete processes including scenario sorting, confirmation of legal basis, and organization of impact assessment materials. Improper handling may lead to complaints, administrative penalties, or removal and rectification. Unlike the data security classification and grading category, this category focuses on full-process compliance handling of information that can identify natural persons.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the "Sharing and Embedding" link
This category’s data contains sensitive information that can identify natural persons, and the update frequency is not real-time. Therefore, the sharing and embedding link must strictly restrict access scope to prevent unauthorized data leaks. Since the data source involves multiple types of business systems and compliance documents, data source synchronization after embedding must be implemented separately by external systems, matching the update rhythm of quarterly or product changes. At the same time, the document structure includes structured lists and unstructured reports. When embedding, teams must ensure that the recalled content only corresponds to the specified compliance document set, avoiding information confusion across data sources. In addition, the consequences of errors are severe. Complete interaction logs must be retained to meet compliance audit requirements, and front-end display must comply with the principle of minimal storage to avoid excessive local storage of personal information.
How to set configurations
The following configuration items are formulated based on FastGPT v4.17.0:
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting Method | Basis for This Setting |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the complete share link generated by the system, do not replace the identifier on one’s own | Identifies the sharing entry; personal information protection compliance business records and data permissions still need to be processed by external systems |
| Share link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of personal information protection compliance collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verifies availability within the validity period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user, needs to be verified combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first check commercial version capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a share link does not equal having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select the display configuration of reference fragments, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity of personal information protection compliance materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces to replace data permission control |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 personal information protection compliance Q&A samples, check on the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearing |
Three common mistakes
- Sharing entries related to personal information protection compliance fail to open. First check the complete system-generated link and its validity period, then compare browser request status; do not replace
shareIdon one’s own. - The visible scope of personal information protection compliance data does not match expectations. Check third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions respectively; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same personal information protection compliance Q&A cannot be seen on another device. For anonymous scenarios, check device, browser, and local identity status first; record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearing, and service abnormalities cannot be judged solely based on this phenomenon.
How to confirm configurations are complete
- Parse the share link, confirm that
shareIdis the system-generated sharing entry identifier. - Initiate an interactive operation on the embedded page, check whether the backend log generates corresponding records, and there are no locally stored interactive traces on the front end.
- Access the embedded page using a non-whitelist domain name, verify that content cannot be loaded normally, and the whitelist domain name can display content normally.
- Test the transfer of externally passed parameters, confirm that only configured non-identifiable parameters are received, and sensitive fields have been desensitized according to external rules.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.