What the data for this category looks like
The core data for this category comes from CI pipelines, change management systems, test reports, and monitoring dashboards. Update cycles are typically weekly or aligned with each version release cycle. Daily produced documents include release plans, launch checklists, acceptance reports, and rollback plans. Data fields include version numbers, release times, change item lists, acceptance results, rollback trigger conditions, and more. Version numbers use semantic versioning format, times are recorded in local standard formats, and change items are categorized and counted by module. This data is typically only circulated within R&D and operations teams, and raw data is not disclosed publicly.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the sharing and embedding workflow
Since data update cycles are typically weekly or aligned with version release cycles, sharing and embedding configurations must match the version release cycle to avoid expired links or outdated content. Data includes sensitive content such as rollback plans, so embedding permissions must be strictly limited to internal business domains. Documents have many fields and are categorized by module, so when embedding, external connected R&D tool systems must support on-demand filtering of displayed content (this function is implemented by the external system; the FastGPT sharing component only provides basic content display) to avoid interference from irrelevant information. Data sources are internal R&D tool systems, and embedding scenarios are mostly connected to R&D and operations office pages. Page layout adaptation must be completed by the external system, and the FastGPT sharing component only provides basic embedding capabilities.
How to Configure Settings
This configuration applies to FastGPT v4.17.0
| Configuration Item | Recommended Starting Value | Rationale for This Setting |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full sharing link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; release management and version acceptance business records and data permissions must still be handled by external systems |
| Sharing link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of release management and version acceptance collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verifies that the link is available within the valid period and checks access behavior after expiration. This value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user. Must be verified using request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a sharing link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for snippets, full text, or original text based on the sensitivity of release management and version acceptance materials | Checks displayed content within authorized data ranges. Hidden interfaces cannot replace data permission controls |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 release management and version acceptance Q&A samples, and check them in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity. Retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Sharing entries related to release management and version acceptance fail to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period, then check browser request statuses. Do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of release management and version acceptance data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately. The sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same release management and version acceptance Q&A is not visible on another device. In anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser, and local identity status. Record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance. Do not use this phenomenon alone to judge service abnormalities.
How to Confirm Configuration Is Complete
- Copy the generated sharing link, open it on the target embedded page in the test environment, and verify that the chat window loads normally and displayed content matches the current version test data.
- Open the browser developer tools console, and confirm there are no cross-domain request errors or
shareIdinvalid prompt messages. - Generate sharing links with different configurations following official procedures, and verify that link functions meet configuration requirements.
- Verify that sharing link expiration time, QPM, and other configurations match the set requirements.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.