What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category mainly comes from WAF, IDS, firewalls, and threat intelligence platforms. Update frequency follows a daily schedule or is triggered by protection events. Daily produced documents include rule change tickets, intercept logs, false positive analysis reports, and policy rollback records. Each document contains fields such as unique rule identifiers, change times, associated IP segments, false positive rate statistics, and policy effective scope. There are no unified fixed units, and some fields are dynamically adjusted based on event scenarios.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on the Sharing and Embedding Link
Since data sources are scattered and update frequencies are not fixed, sharing links can point to the latest intercept logs and rule change content hosted by external systems, with synchronization processed by the external system. Daily document structures vary widely, so the embedding link must support multi-format rule documents and analysis reports output by external systems. Adjustments to protection policies directly affect business and security, so external business systems must configure access range restrictions for shared content to avoid sensitive policy leaks. False positive analysis involves customer business details, so external business systems must support data desensitization for embedded content to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive information. At the same time, sharing needs vary significantly across scenarios, so external business systems must configure different access permission rules for internal technical support and external pre-sales Q&A scenarios. The sharing link validity period can be configured when creating a login-free window.
How to Configure Settings
This configuration is based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full sharing link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; security product rule operation business records and data permissions must still be handled by the external system |
| Sharing link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of security product rule operation collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verifies availability within the validity period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user; must be verified combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements apply, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a sharing link does not equal having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for snippets, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity of security product rule operation materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission controls |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 security product rule operation Q&A samples, check them in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention is not guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three Common Configuration Errors
- Sharing entries related to security product rule operations fail to open. First verify the full link generated by the system and its validity period, then check browser request status; do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible range of security product rule operation data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same security product rule operation Q&A cannot be viewed on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first verify device, browser, and local identity status; retention is not guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance, so do not judge service anomalies solely based on this phenomenon.
How to Confirm Configurations Are Properly Set
- Copy the generated sharing link, attempt to access it in an unauthorized browser or device environment, and verify whether the access permission control of the external business system takes effect.
- Call the relevant interface in the workflow, check that the returned sharing link includes the complete
shareIdparameter generated by the system. - Simulate user operations via the sharing link, check whether the backend of the connected external business system retains corresponding operation logs, and verify whether log configuration is correct.
- Notify the connected external business system to adjust protection rules, refresh the sharing page, and check whether the page loads updated rule information from the external system.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.