What the Data for This Category Looks Like
This category’s data comes from advertising platform backends, customer qualification libraries, contract systems, and publicly available regulatory rules. Update frequency is once per campaign or monthly. Four core document types are processed daily: advertising review forms, qualification attachments, delivery records, and rectification notices. Each document’s fields include campaign ID, customer entity, compliance status, review node, rectification deadline, and similar items. There are no unified units. Only corresponding identifiers are labeled per business scenario. Data must be archived synchronously when a delivery campaign completes or a compliance node updates. The core requirement is to retain a complete, traceable evidence chain.
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on the Sharing and Embedding Workflow
Sharing and embedding for advertising compliance recordkeeping must adapt to call permissions for heterogeneous data from multiple sources. Data comes from multiple systems including advertising platforms and customer qualification systems. After embedding, access scope must be strictly controlled to prevent unauthorized access to non-authorized customer data. Update frequency is once per campaign or monthly. Embedded components must connect to external data synchronization services to trigger data sync on demand, to prevent evidence loss from expired caches. Document types are diverse and fields have no unified standards. Connect to external multi-format document parsing services to support parsing of multiple formats, ensuring that documents such as advertising review forms and rectification notices can be fully displayed. At the same time, compliance recordkeeping requirements mandate that all interactions and data calls are traceable. Connect to external logging services to record access logs for sharing links, to meet subsequent regulatory verification needs.
Configuration Settings
This configuration applies to FastGPT v4.17.0
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full sharing link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identify the sharing entry; advertising compliance recordkeeping business records and data permissions must still be processed by external systems |
| Sharing link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of advertising compliance recordkeeping collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limit the access frequency of a single user; validation is required combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify business edition capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a sharing link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for referenced fragments, full text, or original text based on the sensitivity of advertising compliance recordkeeping materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; hidden interfaces cannot replace data permission controls |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 advertising compliance recordkeeping Q&A samples, check on the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous recording relies on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three Common Mistakes
- Sharing entries related to advertising compliance recordkeeping fail to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period, then cross-check browser request statuses. Do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of advertising compliance recordkeeping data does not match expectations. Cross-check third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions respectively. The sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same advertising compliance recordkeeping Q&A is not visible on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first verify device, browser, and local identity status. Record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance; do not judge service anomalies solely based on this phenomenon.
How to Confirm Configuration Is Complete
- Open the embedded page, access the generated non-login window share link, and verify that documents such as advertising review forms and delivery records load normally.
- Simulate cross-domain access to the embedded page, check if cross-domain interception errors are triggered, and confirm that permission configurations are effective.
- Access the non-login window link, test normal access to the conversation interface on different devices, and verify session validity.
- View records in the external logging service, confirm that access behaviors are fully recorded to meet compliance traceability requirements.
All provided configuration starting points are common defaults, and should be validated against individual sample data and operational conditions.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.