Technical Documentation and Interface Q&A for Game Content Compliance Self-Check: Document Parsing and Chunking

Typical data subjects for this category include game publishing compliance teams, content reviewers, and game producers. Daily processed documents

What the data for this category looks like

Typical data subjects for this category include game publishing compliance teams, content reviewers, and game producers. Daily processed documents fall into four categories: content self-check lists, sensitive content modification records, user agreements, and compliance review minutes. Data sources cover game story scripts, in-game text, art resource supporting instructions, and publicly released regulatory compliance requirements. Documents mostly use mixed formats, including structured tables, plain text paragraphs, and PDF embedded annotations. Fields include content title, review status, modification notes, and corresponding regulatory clauses. Update frequency is once per version or event cycle.

What constraints these characteristics impose on document parsing and chunking

Mixed-format compliance documents require parsing to extract structured tables and PDF annotations, to avoid missing key review information. High-frequency updates per version or event require chunking logic to support incremental parsing after partial content changes, to avoid wasting resources on full re-parsing. The long text attribute of game scripts and text requires chunk thresholds to match the associated length of regulatory clauses and corresponding game content, to avoid breaking associated information during splitting. Timeliness of document updates requires controlling single-file parsing duration to align with version launch schedules, to avoid delays caused by parsing timeouts.

How to set configurations

These configurations are based on FastGPT v4.17.0.

Configuration ItemRecommended Value RangeRationale
chunkSize800–1200 charactersMatches the associated length of regulatory clauses and corresponding game content in compliance documents, to avoid breaking associated information during splitting
chunkSplitterSplit by paragraph + titleAligns with the structure of compliance documents categorized by review nodes and regulatory clauses, to retain contextual associations
customPdfParseEnabledSupports parsing PDF embedded annotations and table content in compliance review minutes, to adapt to compliance document formats for art resource supporting materials
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE1000 MBAdapts to full compliance document packages updated per version, to avoid upload failures due to oversized files
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS600 secondsMeets parsing duration requirements for multi-format mixed documents, to avoid parsing timeouts before version launches
chunkSettingModeManual configurationAdjusts chunking rules for the special structure of compliance documents, to adapt to different types of self-check documents

Three common errors

  • After uploading a compliance document package, the interface shows an abnormal number of chunks, and some chunk statuses show vectorization failure. Repeated retries only occasionally resolve the issue. Cause: The chunkSize parameter is not adjusted. An overly small chunk threshold creates a large number of fragmented chunks, increasing the load on the vectorization node.
  • After using a DB node to query a compliance database, the returned JSON or JSON array cannot be used directly for interface Q&A. Additional code conversion is required. Cause: Parsing rules adapted for structured data are not configured. The default parsing logic cannot automatically recognize non-text format data returned by databases.
  • When parsing compliance review minutes, PDF embedded table annotation content is lost. Cause: The customPdfParse configuration is not enabled. The default parsing logic does not extract supplementary content embedded in PDFs.

How to confirm configurations are correct

  • Upload a single typical compliance document, review the parsed chunk results, and confirm that content associations are not broken during splitting.
  • Test the linkage between the database query node and the Q&A interface, and confirm that returned structured data can be directly processed by the Q&A logic.
  • Upload a compliance document containing tables and annotations, and check if parsed chunks retain original formatting and supplementary content.
  • After adjusting chunk-related configurations, re-upload a large file, and confirm that the parsing process has no timeouts or abnormal errors.

The values provided are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the user's own samples.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.