What the data for this category looks like
Core data for this category centers on outputs from the full cybersecurity classified protection evaluation process. Common structured documents include four types: classification determination reports, gap analysis reports, rectification plans, and evaluation reports. Data is primarily sourced from system asset data collected by evaluation tools, interview records, manually sorted system lists, and security device operation logs. Data is archived and updated per individual evaluation project. Data is archived after the project concludes, and existing data is updated during annual re-evaluations. Fields include control item number, gap item description, rectification evidence associated ID, evaluation conclusion, and no unified fixed unit. Units adjust based on the document type.
What constraints these characteristics impose on HTTP interfaces and external systems
This category's data characteristics impose three core constraints on HTTP interface and external system integration. First, data is archived and updated per individual evaluation project. Interfaces must bind the project's unique identifier as the call context to prevent cross-project data interference. Second, data includes unstructured content such as manually sorted system lists and interview records. Interfaces must support multi-format attachment upload and fixed field verification, matching structured parameters like control item number and rectification evidence ID. Third, data update cycles adjust with project progress. Interfaces must support temporary authorization mechanisms to automatically terminate data access permissions after project completion.
How to configure settings
This configuration is adapted for FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Bearer {project-specific token}, validity tied to project cycle | Matches the category's project-based data isolation feature to prevent unauthorized cross-project access to evaluation documents |
variables | Pass two fixed variables: project ID and control item type | Data for this category must be filtered by project and control item to ensure the interface returns precise data for the corresponding evaluation phase |
| Single search limit | Top 20 items | The number of control items in a single evaluation report typically falls between 10 and 18. Taking the top 20 items covers all control item data |
| Timeout duration | 600 seconds | Rectification evidence collection requires associating multi-source logs and system list data. A single interface call needs sufficient time to complete data retrieval and stitching |
responseData | Only return document and evidence data associated with the current project | Data for this category is archived by project to avoid returning classified protection evaluation information from unrelated projects |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The interface returns a
dataId is emptyerror with status code 400. Cause: The exclusive dataId parameter for the current evaluation project was not passed, or a dataId from a non-current project was passed, and the data scope was not bound by project dimension. - Phenomenon: A 503 status code appears during batch interface calls, with interface response timeout. Cause: Concurrency was not adjusted according to the project cycle. Too many cross-project interface requests were initiated in a short time, exceeding system resource limits.
- Phenomenon: No control item gap data is returned after calling the retrieval interface, only general knowledge base content. Cause: The control item type variable in
variableswas not passed. The interface calls the general retrieval logic by default, and does not match the dedicated data fields for classified protection evaluation.
How to confirm configuration is complete
- Initiate a single interface call, check if the returned
responseDataonly contains document and evidence data for the current evaluation project. - Pass the specified project ID and control item type variables, confirm that the returned result fields match the category's control item number, rectification evidence ID and other fields.
- Initiate batch calls, observe if the interface response duration meets the preset timeout configuration, with no obvious timeout errors.
- Check if the validity period of the
Authorizationparameter matches the current evaluation project's cycle, to ensure calls cannot continue after expiration.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.