What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category primarily originates from GitHub or Gitee Issues, code repository version logs, user-submitted environment information, and problem reproduction instructions. Daily maintained documents include standardized Issue templates, classification tag rules, historical response records, and problem reproduction documentation. Data updates occur daily or weekly. Core fields include Issue number, classification tags, priority, reproduction steps, associated code modules, and more. No fixed unified format exists, so standardized organization must be completed through form interactions.
Constraints Imposed on Forms and Interactions
Since data sources have inconsistent formats, forms must include standardized input fields covering core content such as reproduction steps and runtime environments. This prevents missing key information during triage. Data updates occur daily or weekly, so forms must accept Issue data synchronized from external systems. Timed synchronization is implemented by external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes. The most time-consuming core steps are problem classification and completing reproduction information. Forms must offer quick tag selection and pre-filled template functions, implemented by external business systems or front-end interfaces to cut manual operation costs. Unlike the Pull Request review category, forms in this category prioritize processing user-submitted problem descriptions, with interaction configuration focused on the problem itself.
How to Set Configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form input node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from Issue triage and response fields as required inputs; actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input; when required fields are missing, the interaction status must be checked to avoid subsequent nodes failing to obtain complete input |
User selection node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check the corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; queries and filtering of records related to Issue triage and response are implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Post-submission field passing | Test example: Prepare 10 Issue triage and response input samples covering complete filling, missing required fields, and cancel operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive the corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined by actual tasks |
| External implementation item: Problem classification tag group | Must be implemented separately by external systems; displayed grouped by repository modules, with high-frequency tags expanded by default; this display logic is implemented by external business systems or front-end interfaces | Reduces the time cost of manual input by maintainers |
| External implementation item: Response timeout setting | Must be implemented separately by external systems; 600 seconds | Used as the timeout threshold for test examples, unit is seconds |
| External implementation item: Timed synchronization cycle | Must be implemented separately by external systems; 1 day | Used as the synchronization cycle for test examples, unit is days |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Running a workflow displays "Cannot convert undefined or null to object". The cause is a parsing failure when null or undefined values are passed to subsequent nodes. Input validity check logic is handled by subsequent nodes.
- Unable to perform conditional selection based on GPT output results. The cause is that the mapping rules between tags and corresponding processing flows are not bound in workflow configuration, and the corresponding classification process is not triggered.
- Unable to obtain the latest Issue data during interactive conversations. The cause is that timed synchronization rules are not configured via external systems or subsequent workflow nodes, resulting in the form not acquiring the latest data source.
How to Confirm a Successful Configuration
- Submit a test Issue, check whether the form displays required fields as configured, and pop up corresponding prompts when fields are missing.
- Select preset module tags, confirm whether the workflow triggers the corresponding classification branch to complete automatic triage.
- Wait for external systems or subsequent workflow nodes to complete synchronization, check whether the form updates to the latest GitHub Issue data.
- Simulate submitting empty fields, confirm whether corresponding error prompts pop up, and verify that the input check function is active.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.