This document applies to FastGPT v4.17.0.
What This Category of Data Looks Like
This category of data originates from SIEM, EDR, firewall logs, and host images. Update frequency is real-time or per-event trigger. Daily produced documents include incident response reports, forensics records, disposal plans, and notification materials. Core fields include unique incident identifier, attack source IP address, disposal execution time, evidence chain number, and impact scope level. Data structure adjusts dynamically based on incident complexity. There is no fixed upper limit on the volume of data associated with a single incident. Adaptation is required for multi-source heterogeneous log and document formats.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Forms and Interactions
Multi-source heterogeneous log and document formats require external business systems to separately implement custom field groups and input type adaptations to cover structural differences across documents such as incident response reports and forensics records. The formInput node only collects user input information for corresponding fields and passes it to subsequent workflow nodes. The real-time event update rhythm requires data synchronization and association to be implemented by external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes to avoid data lag. Mandatory requirements for core fields such as incident identifiers require the formInput node to be configured with mandatory validation rules to ensure the integrity of emergency response data. For time-consuming links such as attack path restoration and evidence chain organization, external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes must implement batch import of associated logs to reduce manual entry workload. The userSelect node only passes selected user information. Permission scope division and validation must be implemented by external business systems to distinguish operational boundaries between incident response engineers and security leads.
How to Configure Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form Input Node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from security incident response fields as mandatory inputs; actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input; missing mandatory items require checking interaction status to avoid subsequent nodes failing to receive complete input |
User Selection Node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; query and filtering of security incident response-related records must be implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Post-Submission Field Passing | Test example: Prepare 10 security incident response input samples covering complete filling, missing mandatory items, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined by actual tasks |
| External Implementation Item: Batch Import (External System Side) Upper Limit | Must be separately implemented by external systems; single import of 100 log records (test example value) | Adjust based on actual SIEM log export scale to avoid overloading external business systems |
| External Implementation Item: Submission Trigger Mode | Must be separately implemented by external systems; configure trigger rules via external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes | Adapt to real-time event update rhythm to avoid invalid submissions |
| External Implementation Item: Mandatory Field Validation | Must be separately implemented by external systems; force filling of incident ID and attack source IP | Ensure core integrity of emergency response data |
Three Common Mistakes
- Continuous page refresh when importing forensics logs prevents selecting target files: Check whether the batch import upper limit configuration of the external business system matches the current log import scale
- Fields are empty and cannot be saved after submitting an emergency disposal form: Check whether mandatory field validation configuration for the
formInputnode is enabled - Invalid username displayed when adding team members: Check whether the user matching range configuration of the external business system includes the current operating account scope
How to Confirm Proper Configuration
- Import a single batch of 100 SIEM logs via the external business system, check that the page loads without abnormal refresh
- Attempt to submit a form without filling in the incident ID, confirm that the system pops up a mandatory field prompt
- Switch between different role accounts, check that the editable form field range matches the permission configuration of the external business system
- Simulate a form submission failure scenario, confirm that the external business system or subsequent workflow nodes automatically initiate retries within 30 seconds
The values given are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.