FastGPT v4.17.0
What data for this category looks like
Data for this category originates from SIEM, EDR, NDR, and threat intelligence sources. Update cadence has two categories: real-time and daily. Routine output documents include alarm disposal sheets, duty logs, threat intelligence notifications, daily and weekly reports. Data fields include alarm unique identifier, disposal status, associated threat intelligence number, duty period, submission time, and others. These fields support core workflows: alarm analysis, false positive elimination, and escalation dispatch. No additional custom units are used. All fields follow standard operations and security operation formats.
Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on Forms and Interactions
Real-time updated alarm data requires external systems or downstream nodes to load new fields in real time. This prevents data lag from reducing analysis efficiency. Daily updated weekly reports require external systems to support bulk import or scheduled synchronization configurations. This aligns with fixed-cycle document generation requirements. Field differences across multi-source data require external systems to support custom field mapping. This reduces manual sorting work by adapting to format variations across data sources. False positive markers and escalation dispatch fields in alarm disposal sheets need interactive linkage logic in external business systems. For example, selecting a false positive marker automatically populates preset disposal results. This cuts down the time needed for false positive elimination. Time period fields in duty logs require external systems to support filtering and entry by time range. This fits SOC duty shift scenarios and simplifies the reporting process.
How to Set Configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form Input Node formInput | Test approach: Select 3 fields from security monitoring and SOC duty fields as required inputs. Actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input. Missing required items require checking interaction status to prevent downstream nodes from receiving incomplete input |
User Selection Node userSelect | Test approach: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection. Query and filtering of records related to security monitoring and SOC duty must be implemented by downstream interfaces or external systems |
| Field Passing After Submission | Test approach: Prepare 10 test input samples for security monitoring and SOC duty. Cover full completion, missing required items, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify if downstream nodes receive corresponding fields. Result thresholds are determined by actual tasks |
| External Implementation Item: Field Validation Rules | Must be implemented separately by external systems. Configure required item validation (disposal result, alarm ID). Validation timeout threshold is set by external systems or downstream nodes. Recommended test starting point: 300 seconds | Ensures core disposal fields are not empty. Adapts to rapid analysis scenarios for real-time alarms |
| External Implementation Item: Bulk Import Template | Must be implemented separately by external systems. Match standard field formats of alarm disposal sheets via external systems or downstream nodes | Adapts to bulk import needs for daily updated weekly reports and threat intelligence notifications |
| External Implementation Item: Real-Time Synchronization Configuration | Must be implemented separately by external systems. Set synchronization interval via external systems or downstream nodes. Recommended test starting point: 60 seconds | Adapts to rapid loading of real-time alarm data and prevents data lag |
Three Common Errors
- Symptom: Field mismatch error is prompted when bulk importing alarm disposal sheets via an external system. Verification steps: Check if a standard field template adapted to this category is used. Check if core fields such as alarm ID and disposal status have been mapped.
- Symptom: Some fields are empty after form submission, and duty logs cannot be generated. Verification steps: Check if the
userSelectnode has user interaction trigger logic configured. Check if required field validation configurations have been completed. - Symptom: Real-time alarm data loading delay exceeds 5 minutes, leading to alarm analysis timeout. Verification steps: Check the real-time synchronization interval parameter set by the external system or downstream nodes.
How to Confirm Configuration is Complete
- A test alarm data entry is submitted, the
userSelectnode interaction is triggered, and the input information collected by the form is verified to be passed to downstream nodes. Configuration effectiveness is confirmed. - A test document matching the standard format is uploaded, and full field mapping after import is verified via the external system. Bulk import configuration effectiveness is confirmed.
- The real-time synchronization interval set by the external system or downstream nodes is adjusted, and alarm data updates within the configured interval are observed. Synchronization configuration effectiveness is confirmed.
- A test data entry missing a disposal result is submitted, and a validation prompt is verified to be triggered. Field validation rule effectiveness is confirmed.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader’s own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.