What This Category of Data Looks Like
This category of data comes from advertising platforms, landing pages, product qualifications, and advertising law provisions. Update frequency is daily or real-time. Daily associated documents include ad creative files, landing page screenshots, review opinion sheets, and modification record ledgers. Data fields include creative unique identifiers, violation type tags, review status, submission time, and reviewer numbers. Units are mostly characters, items, or times. There is no unified fixed numerical unit; corresponding dimensions must be matched based on the specific review scenario.
Constraints Imposed on Forms and Interactions
Decentralized, real-time data sources require external business systems to quickly pull and verify multi-source data, preventing review deviations caused by data lag. The need to associate multiple types of documents requires external interaction interfaces to support attachment uploads. Associated field linkage must be implemented by external business systems; for example, after uploading a landing page screenshot, the external business system automatically matches the corresponding creative ID. There is no unified unit for fields, so external interaction interfaces must provide unit selection options, or external business systems must implement automatic adaptation, to prevent reviewers from making errors due to unit confusion. Real-time updated data requires external interaction interfaces to have instant save and version rollback functions, to avoid loss of modification records. The need for association and binding of multiple fields requires external business systems to automatically associate review opinions with creative data, reducing the workload of repeated data entry.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form Input Node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from ad creative review as required inputs; actual fields are determined per task | This node collects user input; when required fields are missing, interaction status must be checked to avoid subsequent nodes failing to receive complete input |
User Selection Node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; querying and filtering ad creative review-related records must be implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Field Passing After Submission | Test example: Prepare 10 ad creative review input samples, covering full completion, missing required fields, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined per actual task |
| External Implementation Item: External Business System Single Submission Limit | Must be implemented separately by external systems; 10 creatives | Matches daily one-by-one review workflow, avoiding overload from single batch processing |
| External Implementation Item: External Interaction Interface Save Timeout Threshold | Must be implemented separately by external systems; 300 seconds | Adapts to loading duration for multiple attachment uploads, preventing submission failure due to network fluctuations |
| External Implementation Item: External Business System Review Opinion Input Length Limit | Must be implemented separately by external systems; 800–1200 characters | Adapts to daily length of review opinion writing, avoiding content that is too long or too short |
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: A "Duplicate input information" error pops up when submitting a review form. Cause: Input deduplication rules are not configured in the external business system, leading to duplicate submission requests for the same creative review.
- Phenomenon: The model selection dropdown menu in the external interaction interface only displays a small number of available models. Cause: Permission filtering rules are not configured in the external model management system, and call permissions for all available models are not enabled.
- Phenomenon: Modification records cannot be automatically associated with review opinions after submitting a review form. Cause: Associated field linkage logic is not configured in the external business system, leading to failure to bind review opinions and creative data.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Upload multiple different types of ad creatives and landing page screenshots, confirm that the external business system can automatically identify and match the corresponding creative ID.
- Switch accounts with different permissions, check whether the optional range passed to the user selection node by the external business system conforms to role configuration, and only authorized reviewers can see corresponding options.
- After submitting the review form, check whether the corresponding modification record ledger is generated, confirm that review opinions and creative data are automatically associated and bound.
- Simulate network fluctuations, test whether the external interaction interface can complete submission normally within 300 seconds without error prompts.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own specific samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.