What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category primarily comes from historical traffic data, service topologies, monitoring metrics, and business growth plans. Daily produced documents include technical solutions, architecture diagrams, capacity assessment reports, and technical review minutes. Fields cover service boundary definitions, resource occupancy thresholds, evolution roadmap planning, and more. There are no fixed uniform units; some parameters require adaptation based on business scenarios. Data is updated monthly or when major requirements are released. Updated content must be synchronized to all associated review documents and architecture baselines.
How These Data Characteristics Constrain Forms and Interactions
The data characteristics of this category require the forms and interactions link to adapt to entry and verification of multi-source heterogeneous data. Historical traffic and monitoring metrics use the formInput component to support multi-dimensional numerical entry. Binding of association relationships between service topologies and architecture diagrams must be implemented by external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes. The userSelect component only handles user selection of service topology nodes. Since data update frequency is low and relies on review closed loops, version traceability and change records must be implemented by external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes. Restricting unauthorized users from modifying locked review baseline fields must be handled by external permission management systems or subsequent nodes to avoid subsequent solution deviations caused by misoperations. Field linkage logic across service boundaries must be implemented by external business systems or subsequent workflow branches, and must comply with constraint conditions of business growth plans.
This configuration rule applies to FastGPT v4.17.0.
How to Set the Configuration
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
Form Input Node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from architecture design and technical solution fields as required inputs; actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input; missing required items require checking interaction status to avoid subsequent nodes failing to receive complete input |
User Selection Node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches item by item | This node handles user selection; query and filtering of records related to architecture design and technical solutions must be implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Field Passing After Submission | Test example: Prepare 10 architecture design and technical solution input samples, covering complete filling, missing required items, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined by actual tasks |
| External Implementation Item: Change Record Retention Duration | Must be implemented separately by external systems; recommended value is 12 months (to be tested) | This configuration is handled by external business systems or subsequent nodes, complying with archiving requirements for review minutes |
| External Implementation Item: Total Attachment Submission Limit | Must be implemented separately by external systems; recommended value is 1000 MB (to be tested) | This configuration is handled by external storage systems or subsequent nodes, adapting to server storage and transmission bandwidth |
| External Implementation Item: Single Verification Timeout | Must be implemented separately by external systems; recommended value is 600 seconds (to be tested) | This configuration is handled by external verification systems or subsequent nodes, avoiding unresponsive situations during long form submission |
Three Common Mistakes
- Select configured options item by item in the
userSelectcomponent, verify whether the workflow enters the corresponding branch. Filtering of architecture design and technical solution records must additionally verify the input, permissions, and return values of external interfaces. - Phenomenon: An error prompt "No associated knowledge base selected" pops up after form submission. Verification steps: Check whether knowledge base association verification logic has been configured in the external business system or subsequent workflow, and whether the association verification is set as a required item.
- Phenomenon: No input restriction prompt is triggered during long text entry, and content is truncated after submission. Verification steps: Check whether external input length verification logic or front-end interception rules have been configured, and confirm that the
formInputcomponent does not have built-in input length verification function.
How to Confirm the Configuration is Set Correctly
- Enter the form configuration page, verify the input mode settings of the
formInputcomponent, confirm that they match the entry requirements of the technical solution. Input length restrictions must be implemented by external systems or the front end. - Test the selectable range of the
userSelectcomponent, verify that only service topology nodes of the current project are displayed, with no redundant or missing items. - Submit a test data entry, check whether the external business system automatically generates change records, whether subsequent nodes trigger the review locking logic, and confirm that the association field verification rules take effect.
- Upload attachments of specified size, verify that the attachment upload and total size limit verification logic of the external storage system or subsequent nodes works normally.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.