Test Cases and Defect Analysis for Game Content Compliance Self-Check: Workflow Orchestration

This category of data mainly comes from game text, art resources, plot scripts, and public regulatory requirements. Updates follow each game version

What the data for this category looks like

This category of data mainly comes from game text, art resources, plot scripts, and public regulatory requirements. Updates follow each game version or event cycle. Daily produced documents include content self-check lists, sensitive content modification records, user agreements, and compliance review minutes. Fields include content snippets, compliance verification tags, modification status, review comments, and more. There is no fixed unified format, and it is adjusted based on the project.

Multi-source data input requires workflows to support access to multiple node types such as text and files. This adapts to mixed verification scenarios for game text and art resources. The high-frequency update cycle requires workflows to bind trigger conditions like version updates or event launches, without repeated configuration. Non-standardized document structures require workflows to support dynamic variables parsing, compatible with self-check lists and review minutes in different formats. The long-link verification-modification-review process requires workflows to support state transfer between nodes and failure branch jumps, covering secondary verification for controversial content.

How to set the configuration

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale for This Setting
Trigger ModeTrigger by version node, or bind the version number parameter in variablesMatches the update rhythm of this category per version or event, to avoid missed triggers from manual operations
Input Node TypesText node + file upload nodeCovers multi-source data input requirements for game text, art resources, and more
Global Variable Storage MethodStore variables per sessionAdapts to state transfer during a single compliance self-check process, retaining verification records for the current version
Failure Branch ConfigurationJump to manual review node, set timeout to 600 secondsCovers scenarios where controversial content cannot be verified automatically, aligns with the manual review link of the compliance process
Node Parameter BindingAssociate context variables corresponding to nodeIdEnsures results from each verification node can be accurately passed to subsequent modification or review links
Debug Mode ConfigurationEnable node input and output logsFacilitates troubleshooting of abnormal parameter transfer, compatible with the debug function of FastGPT v4.17.0

Three common configuration mistakes

  • Phenomenon: When the workflow is used as a tool call, uploaded files cannot correctly pass file links to downstream nodes. Cause: No file link extraction logic is configured in the input node. Direct use of original upload parameters causes link breakage.
  • Phenomenon: After setting global variables, downstream nodes show empty input during debugging. Cause: Variables in variables are not correctly bound to downstream node input parameters, or variable updates are not synchronized to the global context.
  • Phenomenon: The workflow does not trigger as expected when a version is updated. Cause: Trigger mode is set to manual, and no event node for version updates is bound. This prevents the process from starting automatically.

How to confirm the configuration is correct

  • Upload a game plot script file, trigger the workflow to run, and check if the input node correctly reads the file content.
  • Configure global variables in the workflow, call the variables parameter in downstream nodes, and verify if variable values are passed correctly.
  • Simulate a verification failure scenario, and check if the workflow jumps to the manual review node.
  • Check the workflow's trigger configuration, confirm that trigger conditions for version updates or event launches are bound.

The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.