This page applies to FastGPT v4.17.0.
What data for this category looks like
Core documents for this category include gameplay design plans, numeric tables, version requirement lists, and balance test records. Fields mostly cover rule parameters, growth curve values, trigger conditions, feedback tags, and more. Units include percentages, seconds, call counts, and similar metrics. Data sources include player behavior data, public competitor materials, battle logs, and version feedback. Update frequency is weekly or per version cycle. Daily adjustments to rules and values align with version release timelines.
What constraints these characteristics impose on forms and interactions
The document structure for this category is complex with diverse fields, including subdivided content such as rule parameters and growth curve values. External business system interfaces support multi-block nested input to accommodate different types of planning documents. Data sources are scattered, so external business systems enable batch import and association binding of fields from multiple sources including player behavior data and battle logs. External business systems support form version management and historical rollback for version iterations, aligning with weekly or per-version update cycles. Errors may lead to gameplay imbalance or version rework, so external business systems deploy pre-check rules to block input content that does not comply with business logic.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form input node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from game planning and numeric design as required inputs; actual fields are determined per task | This node collects user input; missing required items require interaction status checks to prevent subsequent nodes from receiving incomplete input |
User selection node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; queries and filtering of game planning and numeric design related records must be implemented via subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Field passing after submission | Test example: Prepare 10 game planning and numeric design input samples, covering fully filled forms, missing required items, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined per actual task |
| External implementation item: Form blocks (implemented via external business system interfaces) | Must be implemented separately by external systems; split into 3 blocks: "Rule Parameters", "Numeric Tables", "Version Feedback" based on document type | Match daily document structure to lower input barriers |
| External implementation item: Field validation rules (implemented via external business systems) | Must be implemented separately by external systems; numeric fields retain 2 decimal places, rule fields are required | Adapt to precision requirements of numeric tables, avoid logical errors caused by empty rules |
| External implementation item: Batch import template (implemented via external business systems) | Must be implemented separately by external systems; support CSV format, with fields matching form fields one-to-one | Adapt to batch import requirements for player behavior data and battle logs |
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: "Knowledge base not associated" prompt appears after submitting test cases. Cause: Subsequent workflow node association binding with the knowledge base is not configured, so corresponding data cannot be called for verification.
- Phenomenon: Field mismatch error occurs when batch importing numeric tables via external business systems. Cause: The field order of the import template does not match the field order of the form, and the submission does not follow the preset template format.
- Phenomenon: Interactive operations have no response. Cause: Subsequent workflow nodes are not correctly configured to receive input parameters collected by the
formInputnode, so the workflow cannot continue execution.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Open the test case creation page in the external business system, verify that the form blocks match the structure of gameplay design plans and numeric tables.
- Enter non-numeric content into numeric fields, check whether the external business system triggers preset validation prompts.
- Upload a preset format CSV import template via the external business system, confirm that fields can be properly bound to corresponding positions in the form.
- Enter the form historical record page in the external business system, confirm that the version rollback function is enabled normally.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.