What this category of data looks like
On-site deployment implementation test cases and defect analysis data originate from customer data center environments, device inventories, software packages, and network topologies. The update frequency is per order or per phase. Associated daily documents include deployment manuals, installation records, configuration lists, and on-site check-in sheets. Each document has fixed fields: deployment manuals include version numbers and installation steps; installation records include timestamps and device identifiers; configuration lists include software versions and port parameters; on-site check-in sheets include executing personnel and arrival times. The data structure aligns with the linear workflow of on-site execution, and is compatible with the form component logic of FastGPT v4.17.0.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the Forms and Interactions link
Data for on-site deployment implementation comes from scattered sources and relies on the customer’s unique on-site environment. This requires forms to support dynamic adaptation to different customers’ devices and network parameters. The update frequency of per order or per phase requires forms to support version iteration and staged submission. The fixed field structure of daily documents requires forms to match the required and display logic of corresponding fields. The most time-consuming links of environment inspection, software installation and configuration, and on-site problem troubleshooting require forms to add interactive nodes for these links to reduce manual entry costs. At the same time, defect analysis needs to be associated with on-site collected data. This requires workflows to support passing fields collected by forms to subsequent nodes, adapting to links such as knowledge base and tool calls.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form input node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from on-site deployment implementation fields as required inputs; actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input. If required items are missing, check the interaction status to avoid subsequent nodes failing to obtain complete input |
User selection node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check the corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection. Queries and filtering of on-site deployment implementation related records must be implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Post-submission field passing | Test example: Prepare 10 on-site deployment implementation input samples, covering complete filling, missing required items, and canceled operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields. Result thresholds are determined by actual tasks |
| External implementation item: Single submission file size limit | Must be implemented separately by the external system; 1000 MB (test example value) | Adapts to conventional storage scenarios for software packages and device inventories, avoiding upload timeouts |
| External implementation item: Submission time recording | Must be implemented separately by the external system; submission time is automatically recorded by the external system or subsequent nodes | Meets the precise recording requirements of the data update frequency of per order or per phase |
| External implementation item: Defect classification dropdown options | Must be implemented separately by the external system; the external system provides optional classification lists (test example covers three categories: environment abnormalities, configuration errors, network failures) | Covers common types of on-site problem troubleshooting, simplifying defect entry and classification |
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: Submitted installation record fields are empty. Verification action: Check the required item configuration of the form node, verify whether the fields match the fixed field structure of daily documents.
- Phenomenon: Form submission times out. Verification action: Check the single submission file size limit configuration, verify whether the uploaded file size exceeds the limit.
- Phenomenon: Variable reference fails during knowledge base search. Verification action: Check the variable passing configuration of the form input node, verify whether collected variables such as device ID are correctly passed to subsequent search links.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Complete
- Verify that the form fields match the structure of deployment manuals, installation records, configuration lists, and on-site check-in sheets, ensuring all necessary fields are covered.
- Test submission of small-volume test files to confirm the upload process can be triggered normally without abnormal errors.
- Trigger knowledge base search for defect records to confirm that variables collected by the form can be normally passed to the search link.
- Check the required item verification logic to confirm that the form cannot be submitted when required fields are not filled in.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against relevant samples for the specific deployment scenario.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.