What data for this category looks like
Data for this category typically comes from daily deliverables of internet product teams, business analysts, and product managers. These include requirement research notes, PRD documents, user story lists, and requirement change orders. Data sources cover customer interview records, internal ticketing systems, competitor public pages, and event tracking dashboards. Update frequency is weekly or per version iteration. Document structure centers on core fields: business objectives, acceptance criteria, and functional boundaries. There are no uniform mandatory units. Adjustments must be made based on specific requirement scenarios.
What constraints these characteristics impose on forms and interactions
Multi-source information aggregation from requirement research notes requires external business systems to handle multi-field batch import and classification tag binding. This reduces time spent classifying interview information. Form nodes only support single-item information entry. Version synchronization requirements for PRDs require external business systems or subsequent workflow nodes to handle change record association logic. This reduces errors in requirement change synchronization. Clarity of acceptance criteria requires external business systems to provide fixed field templates. This simplifies the process of confirming boundary conditions. Form nodes are only used to collect entered information. In multi-team collaboration scenarios, front-end rendering logic (external or subsequent nodes) must limit the maximum number of fields per form. This avoids front-end rendering lag. At the same time, external business systems split form permission modules by role. When batch importing requirement documents, external systems or subsequent nodes must handle data format verification. This avoids escape character anomalies.
How to configure settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Form input node formInput | Test example: Select 3 fields from requirements analysis and PRD management as required inputs; actual fields are determined by the task | This node collects user input; missing required items requires checking interaction status to avoid subsequent nodes failing to obtain complete input |
User selection node userSelect | Test example: Set 2 business options, check corresponding branches one by one | This node handles user selection; querying and filtering records related to requirements analysis and PRD management must be implemented by subsequent interfaces or external systems |
| Field passing after submission | Test example: Prepare 10 requirement analysis and PRD management input samples, covering complete filling, missing required items, and cancel operations | Compare input and node output to verify whether subsequent nodes receive corresponding fields; result thresholds are determined based on actual tasks |
| External implementation item: Batch import verification rules | Must be implemented separately by external systems; handle data escape verification logic via external systems or subsequent nodes, with a single import limit of 800–1200 characters | This serves as an example value for testing the single import character limit, avoiding escape character residue issues during import |
| External implementation item: Field permission grouping | Must be implemented separately by external systems; configure resource access scope in external business systems by role; userSelect node only handles interactive selection | This serves as an example configuration for testing permission grouping, clarifying the operational boundaries of each role |
| External implementation item: Form custom field limit | Must be implemented separately by external systems; set via front-end rendering logic (external or subsequent nodes) to the first 20 items | Control the amount of single-form data to avoid lag caused by excessive front-end rendering load |
Three common mistakes
- After submitting forms related to requirements analysis and PRD management, subsequent nodes do not receive complete fields. Cross-check required items, actual submitted content, and node output mappings one by one, then check subsequent interface returns; existing symptoms cannot independently determine the root cause.
- Phenomenon: In tool call forms associated with knowledge bases, specified knowledge base resources cannot be selected. Verification step: Check whether the external business system has configured knowledge base access permissions for the corresponding role;
userSelectnode only handles interactive selection. - Phenomenon: After adding more than 20 custom fields, obvious lag occurs during form drag-and-drop and deletion operations. Verification step: Check whether front-end rendering logic (external or subsequent nodes) has set a form custom field limit.
How to confirm configurations are properly set
- Upload a test JSON document containing escape characters, check whether the external system or subsequent nodes have completed escape character verification processing.
- Switch accounts with different roles, verify whether the permission grouping of
userSelecttakes effect, and only fields and resources accessible to the corresponding role can be viewed. - Add more than 20 custom fields, test whether form drag-and-drop and deletion operations are smooth and free of lag.
- Check whether the external business system or subsequent workflow nodes have generated and associated corresponding requirement change order records.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.