What data for this category looks like
Data for this category is generated around personal information processing activities that can identify natural persons. Data sources include business systems, App permission lists, privacy policy documents, and user request records. Daily produced documents include personal information lists, processing rules, impact assessment reports, and user authorization texts. Data is updated quarterly or after each product function change. Core processing links include scenario sorting, confirmation of legal basis, and organization of impact assessment materials. Errors may lead to user complaints, administrative penalties, or product removal for rectification. The difference from the data security classification and grading category is that all configurations and verifications in this category revolve around the entire process of personal information processing that can identify natural persons.
Constraints on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems from These Data Characteristics
The data characteristics of this category impose multiple constraints on the HTTP interfaces and external systems link. First, data sources are scattered and involve multiple types of business systems. Interfaces must support cross-system data pulling, and use the Authorization parameter for authentication to ensure only authorized subjects can access compliance-related data. Second, data update frequency is not fixed. Interfaces must use variables to bind dynamically updated compliance documents, to avoid using expired personal information lists or authorization texts. Third, the responseData returned by interfaces must strictly filter fields that can identify natural persons, to prevent personal information leaks. Interface logs must be retained for a sufficient duration to meet audit and traceability requirements.
How to Set Configurations
The following configurations are formulated based on FastGPT v4.17.0.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Bearer {API key allocated by the compliance team} | Ensure the interface caller is a legally authorized subject, complying with data access permission control requirements |
variables | Bind static variables for personal information lists and user authorization texts, set the update cycle to quarterly or within 1 day after a product change | Match the update frequency of category data, ensuring the compliance documents used by the interface are always the latest version |
responseData | Filter out fields that can identify natural persons, only retain necessary compliance statistics fields | Comply with personal information protection requirements, avoid user privacy leaks from interface return data |
| Interface log retention period | No less than 180 days | Meet compliance audit and traceability requirements, address verification needs for complaints or administrative penalties |
| External system call timeout threshold | 300-600 seconds, calibrated based on actual testing | Adapt to the batch processing characteristics of compliance data, avoid incomplete data processing caused by timeout interruptions |
| Interface access frequency limit | No more than 20 times per minute | Avoid frequent calls triggering external system risk controls, while ensuring the processing efficiency of compliance data |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Calling the external compliance data interface returns the error "column vector does not exist". The reason is that the personal information vector storage module of the external system was not initialized correctly, and the field structure of the compliance data was not synchronized and updated.
- Unmasked user personal information titles appear in conversation logs when calling via API. The reason is that the
responseDatafilter rule was not configured, and original business data was returned directly, violating personal information protection requirements. - No return data after calling the external system. The reason is that the
Authorizationparameter was configured incorrectly, and the interface was blocked due to failed authentication, so compliance data could not be obtained.
How to Confirm Configuration Completion
- Call the test interface, check that the
responseDatareturned result does not contain unmasked personal information that can identify natural persons. - Trigger the variable update operation, confirm that the content of the compliance documents bound to
variablesis synchronized to the latest version. - Verify that the
Authorizationparameter is configured correctly, and the interface returns a 200 status code after calling. - View the interface log retention record, confirm that the log retention duration meets the preset requirements.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.