What the data for this category looks like
This category’s data comes from game text, art resources, plot scripts across game versions or operational activities, and publicly available regulatory compliance requirements. Daily associated documents include content self-check lists, sensitive content modification records, user agreements, and compliance review minutes. The update rhythm aligns with game versions or activities. Data fields include content type, review status, modification traces, review comments, and more. Field units match the attributes of specific content items, with no unified fixed format.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the "HTTP Interfaces and External Systems" link
Data for this category is scattered across multiple carriers such as game text, art resources, and plot scripts, and is updated frequently with versions or activities. This requires HTTP interfaces to support batch access to multi-format content, and adapt to verification logic across different review nodes. Associated documents are strongly bound to review data. Interfaces must pass document association identifiers to ensure review results can be traced back to corresponding self-check lists or review minutes. The uncertain update rhythm requires interfaces to dynamically adjust request frequency, to avoid exceeding call thresholds of compliance review systems. At the same time, review failure directly affects game launch timelines. Interfaces must have failure retry and status synchronization capabilities to ensure process continuity.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication Method | Bearer {API key provided by the compliance review system} | Complies with industry-standard API authentication specifications, ensures call security, and adapts to the interface configuration requirements of FastGPT v4.17.0 |
| Request Variables | Fixed fields including content type and associated document identifier | Matches the business characteristic of binding this category’s data and documents, ensures submitted content aligns with interface requirements |
| Return Data Format | Structured JSON including review status, review comments, and associated document ID | Facilitates synchronization of review results to compliance self-check lists and review minutes, enabling full-process traceability |
| Request Timeout | 600 seconds | Adapts to the average processing duration of content review for this category, avoids interrupting the review process due to timeout |
| Retry Count | 3 times | Addresses temporary fluctuations in the compliance review system, ensuring stability of the review process |
| Maximum Request Frequency | Calibrated based on actual testing | Matches the call threshold of the compliance review system, avoids triggering current-limiting rules |
Three common mistakes
- Symptom: Calls to the compliance review interface return a 401 Unauthorized status code, and review results cannot be obtained. Cause: Incorrect authentication method configuration, failing to correctly carry the API key of the compliance review system.
- Symptom: The content parameter value in the interface request body is empty, or does not match the actually submitted game text or art resource link. Cause: Request variables are not configured as required, causing submitted content to not be correctly mapped to interface fields.
- Symptom: Review results cannot be synchronized to the compliance self-check list, and associated document identifiers are lost. Cause: The return data format does not include the associated document ID, making it impossible to bind review results to daily self-check documents.
How to confirm configurations are complete
- Call the test interface, check if the returned
responseDataincludes review status, review comments, and associated document identifiers, to confirm the data structure meets configuration requirements. - Submit a single test content item, verify that authentication passes, to confirm the
Authorizationparameter is configured correctly. - Simulate high-frequency calls, observe interface return statuses, to confirm the maximum request frequency configuration complies with the requirements of the compliance review system.
- Review the audit result synchronization logs, confirm that the
variablesparameter correctly maps submitted content and associated document identifiers, enabling data binding.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.