What this category of data looks like
Code security audit data typically comes from source code repositories, dependency lists, static application security testing (SAST) tools, and public vulnerability databases. Daily produced documents include code audit reports, vulnerability proof documents, repair recommendation documents, and retest records. Each document’s fields correspond to vulnerability IDs, risk levels, impact scopes, repaired code snippets, and similar items. Data update frequency follows project version iterations or completion of individual audit tasks, with no fixed cycle but tied to project or version milestones.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the "Sharing and Embedding" workflow
Documents for code security audits contain sensitive vulnerability details and repair solutions, so access permission scope must be strictly controlled when sharing. Audit data structures vary across different projects, so adaptation logic such as custom field mapping and data version association must be implemented separately by external business systems. Manually reviewed business logic data has no standardized format, so external systems must reserve flexible configuration space to adapt to different audit scenarios. FastGPT sharing links only provide basic content distribution capabilities.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Practice | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing Entry shareId | Copy the complete sharing link generated by the system, do not replace the identifier manually | Identifies the sharing entry; code security audit business records and data permissions still need to be handled by external systems |
| Sharing Link Expiry Period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on code security audit collaboration cycles and revocation requirements through actual testing | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits access frequency for a single user, requires verification combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity Verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by third-party identity services | Holding a sharing link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced Content Display | Select display configurations for referenced snippets, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity of code security audit materials | Check displayed content within authorized data scope; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission control |
| Conversation Record Verification | Test example: Prepare 10 code security audit Q&A samples, check them on the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after clearing cache |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Code security audit-related sharing links fail to open. First verify the complete system-generated link and its expiry period, then cross-check browser request statuses. Do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of code security audit data does not match expectations. Cross-check third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately. The sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same code security audit Q&A cannot be viewed on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first verify device, browser, and local identity status. Retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after clearing cache; do not judge service anomalies solely based on this phenomenon.
How to Confirm Configurations Are Successfully Applied
- Open the embedded preview page of the sharing link, confirm that the interface language matches the adaptation parameters configured by the external business system.
- Attempt to access the embedded link from a non-internal domain name, confirm that a permission interception prompt is triggered.
- Replace
shareIdwith an invalid identifier, confirm that the component displays a data loading failure prompt. - View the network request logs of the embedded page, confirm that the
shareIdcarried in the request matches the identifier of the officially generated sharing link.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.