What Data for This Category Looks Like
Typically, data sources for this category are Figma or Axure files, internal design systems, user feedback and usability test records. Daily produced documents include interactive prototypes, page flowcharts, component descriptions and review records. Data update frequency is usually once weekly or aligned with product version iterations. Data fields typically include page structure identifiers, component interaction rules, review comment status, operation path descriptions, and more. There is no unified mandatory format, and most content is stored using the native structure of design tools or as team-customized documents.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on the "Sharing and Embedding" Link
First, most data sources are native files from design tools. When embedding, adaptation to references of prototype fragments in different formats is required, and structured fields from general knowledge bases cannot be directly reused. Second, update frequency aligns with product version iterations. Shared links must rely on the version management capabilities of external design tools to avoid displaying outdated prototype content after embedding. Third, most documents are unstructured interaction descriptions. Post-embedding Q&A must accurately match operation paths in the prototype, and context range must be limited to reduce interference from irrelevant information. Fourth, team-customized review record fields are inconsistent. It is necessary to rely on the configuration capabilities of external design tools to adapt to the document structures of different teams. Sharing and embedding for this scenario type must rely on the sharing capabilities of external design tools. FastGPT only supports accessing compliant shared links, and can adapt to different design source formats through standardized configuration.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
Sharing Entry shareId | Copy the complete shared link generated by the system, do not replace the identifier manually | Identifies the sharing entry; business records and data permissions for prototype and interaction design must still be handled by external systems |
| Shared Link Validity Period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on the prototype and interaction design collaboration cycle and revocation requirements through actual testing | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user, needs to be verified combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity Verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial version capabilities and the uid returned by the third-party identity service | Holding a shared link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced Content Display | Select the display configuration of reference fragments, full text and original text based on the sensitivity of prototype and interaction design materials | Check displayed content within the authorized data range, hidden interfaces cannot be used as a substitute for data permission control |
| Conversation Record Verification | Test example: Prepare 10 prototype and interaction design Q&A samples, check on the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on browser local identity, retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Sharing entries related to prototypes and interaction designs fail to open. First verify the complete link generated by the system and its validity period, then check browser request status; do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible range of prototype and interaction design data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters and external system data permissions separately; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same prototype and interaction design Q&A cannot be seen on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser and local identity status; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after cache clearance, do not judge the service as abnormal solely based on this phenomenon.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Copy the generated embedding code, paste it into a test web page, and check if the content of the corresponding prototype and interaction design document loads normally.
- Initiate a test conversation, confirm that the chat record is only visible to the current operator, and other test users cannot view the conversation.
- Update the prototype document through the version management capabilities of the external design tool, refresh the embedded page, and confirm that the latest version of the content is loaded.
- Check the embedded page, confirm that only necessary controls related to design document display are loaded.
The values given here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.