What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category primarily comes from SIEM, EDR, NDR, and third-party threat intelligence sources, with update cadences of real-time or daily. Associated daily documents include alarm disposal tickets, on-duty records, threat intelligence briefings, and weekly or monthly security daily reports. Data fields include alarm unique identifiers, associated asset IPs, threat levels, disposal statuses, assignment times, and more. The data is constructed exclusively around the alarm circulation and disposal workflows for security operations, with no extra custom statistical fields.
Constraints Imposed on Sharing and Embedding
Real-time updated alarm data requires that shared embedded chat windows can call external data sources to pull the latest information, avoiding returning outdated alarm details. Daily updated security briefings and daily reports require external knowledge base systems to support filtering associated documents by time range. FastGPT sharing and embedding only provides a basic display carrier. SOC analysts often work across multiple terminals, so embedded chat windows can be configured with adaptive display via the embedding code of FastGPT publishing channels, adapting to different browsers and terminal sizes. Alarm disposal tickets contain sensitive operation details, so identity authentication must be used to restrict unauthorized access and prevent sensitive information leaks. The high timeliness requirement for real-time alarm analysis requires that the response delay of the embedding function meets the response requirements of security operations.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Sharing entry shareId | Copy the full share link generated by the system; do not manually replace the identifier | Identifies the sharing entry; business records and data permissions for security monitoring and SOC operations must still be handled by external systems |
| Share link validity period | Test starting point: 7 days; adjust based on actual testing of security monitoring and SOC operation collaboration cycles and revocation requirements | Verify availability within the valid period and access behavior after expiration; this value is not an official default or industry statistic |
| QPM | Test starting point: 20 requests per user per minute; adjust based on actual load | Limits the access frequency of a single user; needs to be verified combined with request logs and actual load |
| Identity verification | When identity permission requirements exist, first verify commercial edition capabilities and the uid returned by third-party identity services | Holding a share link does not equate to having business data permissions; third-party identity and data scope must be verified separately |
| Referenced content display | Select display configurations for reference fragments, full text, and original text based on the sensitivity of security monitoring and SOC operation materials | Check displayed content within authorized data ranges; do not use hidden interfaces as a substitute for data permission control |
| Conversation record verification | Test example: Prepare 10 security monitoring and SOC operation Q&A samples, check them in the same browser and another device respectively | Anonymous records rely on local browser identity; retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after clearing cache |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Sharing entries related to security monitoring and SOC operations fail to open. First verify the full system-generated link and its validity period, then check browser request statuses; do not manually replace
shareId. - The visible scope of security monitoring and SOC operation data does not match expectations. Verify third-party identity verification results, workflow request parameters, and external system data permissions separately; the sharing entry identifier itself does not provide business authorization.
- The same security monitoring and SOC operation Q&A cannot be viewed on another device. For anonymous scenarios, first check device, browser, and local identity status; record retention cannot be guaranteed across devices or after clearing cache, so do not judge service abnormalities solely based on this phenomenon.
How to Confirm Successful Configuration
- Open the share link, check whether login or team identity verification is required, and confirm that the authentication configuration takes effect.
- Initiate a query containing a known alarm ID, check whether the reply returns the latest alarm disposal status in real time, and confirm that the streaming output and external data source configuration take effect.
- Open the share link on different terminals and browser windows, check whether the chat window can adaptively display content, and confirm that the embedding adaptation configuration is correct.
- Copy the embedding code to a test page, initiate a query after loading, check whether the chat window can load normally and return associated alarm and document information, and confirm that the sharing configuration is correct.
The values provided are common starting points and should be validated against samples relevant to the specific use case.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-10-19.